They're teenage mutant ninja turtles. Okay, take a step back and break that sentence down. Think long and hard about it.
They're teenage mutant ninja turtles. Okay, take a step back and break that sentence down. Think long and hard about it.
those first 3 harry potter games were surprisingly well made. They haven't aged well, but they were some of the few licensed games that didn't completely suck
Well, news outlets have had access to the PC version for a few weeks now, so the consensus has been out there. Figured it was common knowledge that the PC version of ds2 is nothing like the PC version of ds1 and its a good port. It isn't earth shatteringly different when compared to the console versions, but its…
obviously PC if you can run it, but the ps3 version isnt bad
If big AAA games got anymore expensive than they are, I could see myself stop buying them day 1 completely. Honestly, most of my enjoyment from gaming is coming from smaller, cheaper indie games. Great design trumps high production values imo (just look at things like spelunky and the binding of isaac. I've put 100's…
You must have an incredible ability to read between the lines.
Yes, there's pretty huge differences between some of the different cuts. I recommend the Final Cut (or directors cut, which is pretty much the same. final cut cleans up a bunch of things though). Theatrical has really horrible narration that ruins the whole vibe of the movie. It was something added in by the films…
That's not true. It's definitely not a movie you pop in often, but movies like this do benefit from repeated viewings.
It isn't Miyazaki, it's Takahata (who is the complete opposite stylistically).
It's considered a war film (rightfully so) but don't think its akin to something like Saving Private Ryan where there's a lot of on screen fighting/action. There's very little of that in the film. It's entirely about the effects of war on civilians, and a nation at an all time economic low (an all time low for Japan…
giant bombs wiki has been attempting something similar for far longer. Not only do they have an expansive list of games, game creators, companies, and even shit like concepts found in games, they also have a plethora of information on these subjects.
Ps3, Vita, Laptop, Nexus 7. Game on my laptop/ps3 the most, vita I play casually. Nexus 7 I rarely play games on, but I do when a widely talked about mobile game comes out (like ridiculous fishing or threes!). I actually do play the pinball arcade for a decent amount of time, which is why I counted it.
Looks potentially interesting, but all I really want is more info on the new gravity rush. Hopefully it's going to be on vita (I've heard that it might be a ps3 game instead)
touch screen games can be great... if they are designed for a touchscreen. This looks like it is, and it looks really promising (getting a trippy samurai jack vibe from the art)
Uh, yes they did. Other teams worked on it too, but gearbox was totally involved in its production. Not sure what they worked on, when they became involved, etc, but they definitely worked on it to some extent.
Dont these people realize that you can get paid to fuck on camera? Are they so wasted that they forget this and are willing to bone on live camera for free?
It depends on if they are in the 'streaming' rooms (or whatever they're called). Most of the panel rooms don't have the internet capabilities to stream, but they do set up specific rooms where streaming is possible.
Would have been so much better if he yelled " Mooooooommm?" "MOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!" at the end
Its not missing, they changed it to better fit the design of the game. Dark Souls 2 would really suck if you had to hold a torch in your hand for any amount of time while fighting enemies (unless you build your character around not having a shield, which few people do).
The difference you are able to extrapolate by looking at these images/video are staggering. If shown to a normal human being, they would notice only a slight difference between the 2. Truly fascinating