ronaldgbrownii
Ronnie
ronaldgbrownii

Now, THAT would make a great Combine video.

Salty language is MUCH more entertaining when it is directed at someone, as opposed to being a general exclamation.

Now playing

As a Panther’s fan, I couldn’t pass up the chance to add this one:

I’ve heard a lot of guys brag that if they ran, they’d trip over their own dick, but this is the first time I’ve actually seen it happen.

Oh, from your original post, I thought you were talking about One-Eyed Monster, starring Ron Jeremy.

Embedded video player sucks, y’all have a youtube link so I can actually watch the video without jerky video lags?

Embedded player still sucks; off to watch on Youtube!

I agree, it’s like those garbage shots you friends make you do on your twenty-first birthday. “Now that that nonsense is out of the way, it’s time to get down to some serious drinking.”

Video is extremely choppy in Firefox, Youtube plays great. Please continue to include a link to the Youtube video in future posts. Thanks!

Right before the ref gets in the way, watch the front of Sedin’s jersey. You’ll see a small white blur fall in front of his right side (your left).

And since no insect was listed with the gasoline, it must have been effective!

If he was rolling around on those beds, he was definitly shit-faced.

Ugh, they just don’t taste the same once they’ve been frozen.

No humans died making the Hobbit, but over 25 animals were killed during filming.

I wouldn’t call that private property argument shaky, since it was upheld in the Minnesota Supreme Court in 1999. To quote that ruling, “neither the presence of public financing alone nor the public financing coupled with an invitation to the public to come onto the property is sufficient to transform privately owned

To be clear, I’m not commenting on the source article, I am commenting on the article given here, as it was written. I have no problem with taking a poorly written dead animal story, and running with it. As opposed to taking a dead animal, and running with it. Down here in the swamp, we call that “fast food”.

Yes, I’m assuming that’s what happened also, but it’s not what the article says. Can I be faulted for joking about it when the article clearly states “it was put down with a taser”? And I’m pretty sure you can kill a 40 pound animal with tasers. It may just take multiple tasers and multiple shocks. It being South

OK, that’s slightly better. The article gives the impression that they lit it up with the tasers until it smoked.

They probably got the “international” designation from South American drug flights.

Another name for “nuisance animal” is “target”. I’m wondering if using the taser meant less paperwork, because I’m thinking this is one of the rare instances that a bullet would have been the more humane option. Of course, relocation, a wild animal rescue group or even a zoo would have been even more humane than