roguehurricane13
Fuck You I Wrote It Down
roguehurricane13

I empathize. I am a work-from-home social media manager and my family thinks it’s an imaginary job. Nothing imaginary about having a great rate per hour, corporate card, health insurance, and multiple clients. Still I get calls about minimum-wage job openings, as though my time would be better spent working overtime

My grandpa has had a radio show every Sunday for the past like, 40 years or something. When I was a kid, he used to let me go do his radio show with him. Taught me how to use all the equipment and everything. When I was 13 and he went out of town, my mom did the show for him and she let me run it by myself since I

I disagree. We tell boys they can be anything they want to be, harness and coddle them. Girls are told they can be anything they want to be, within reason.

Yeah, it would be all, “look what a smart little go-getter Tommy is.”

I had that same thought. If she was a boy, you just know all the comments would be how awesome he is and what a great future he has and what a go-getter he is and blah fucking blah. Get it, Hilde!

Eh, they tell boys they should be macho and they should play sports and they should be able to fight and they should fuck as many girls as possible and they should do a bunch of boy-shit. I understand your point and agree that sentiment is utter bullshit, but it’s not really fair to keep setting up this false

She can report on the lawsuit about all the jobs being “internally outsourced” to immigrants at Disney World.

But apparently swearing at her is totes cool. Ugh. The people of that town don’t deserve her!

She’s too good, Disneyland wouldn’t want her. She’d be there ten minutes and uncover corruption and cotton candy price-fixing in the first ten minutes.

“9 year old girls should be playing with dolls, not trying to be reporters”

“What happened to tea parties?”

This girl is my hero! What a badass!

This girl is amazing. I vote she gets a Pulitzer.

There are many things in the American government that are “voter suppression.” The president can veto a bill even if it passed Congress. Supreme court justices can hand down rulings that reject or re-interpret a bill. Congress can override the president. It’s all checks and balances, any of whom could easily be

Liberals lose elections because they refuse to show up to vote in midterms. That is the one and only reason. 2010 and 2014 were fucking BLOODBATHS up and down the ticket, because Democrats fall in love with presidential candidates and ignore politics for 4 years in between, despite the fact that who’s sitting in the

The superdelegates exist essentially to stop someone like Trump from hijacking the party’s nomination. They do not commit until the day of the convention on the floor of the convention — they can publicly say they’re supporting someone but they’re not pledged and they could change their mind on the convention floor

I think this is a bizarre argument. The liberals lose elections because they have scruples. But eschewing those scruples to briefly play by someone else’s rules doesn’t mean he’s not trying to save the democratic process. It just means that no one can win without playing by the DNC’s rules.

The superdelegate process is voter suppression.

Yes, but there is no way in hell that that would have ever happened. The DNC has an anointed candidate from the get-go, and the super delegates fall in line with the DNC’s wishes at least until the convention. It happened in 2008 when, once again, Hillary Clinton was “the chosen one”.

untrue! no matter who is using them for their benefit!