“This will all be over by June, right?”

The most unforgivable part for me was that “Them” were almost entirely lacking in anything to do, and the casting for Adam seemed to inadvertently put a plank of wood in the role instead of an actor. ;)

I’m sorry but no, Occam’s razor is needed on this.

Gaiman mentioned during filming that he had a roadmap plotted out for a sequel (fleshed out from some ideas he kicked around with Terry prior to his death) that would focus more on the conflict between the angels and devils, and that there were characters introduced in the TV series that would have a bigger part to…

Freeing it from the book might actually be a good thing, as it was already to all intents and purposes the “Crowzraphile” show, with pretty much everything else being hugely disappointing compared to the book. (IMO, of course, before the pile-on begins.)

Agreed, I was sure I’d seen him say something along the lines of “not without Terry Pratchet” I really don’t feel that the series needs a sequel. Unless he has a really solid idea ideally one that came from that collaboration back in the day, then they should leave it at that.

I’d enjoy the eff out of this, but I suspect it would lack an ineffable something with the absence of Sir Terry. Might be better to do spiritual sequels.

It remains to be seen if this was a practice or not. So far, this is an interpretation based on two temple complexes. The next step in this study should be a broad survey to see if there were ramps at temples other than Epidaurus and Corinth and if they appear at temples for gods other than Asclepius. We might be…

Maybe is me but I see a lot more terry than Neil in good omens.... Not sure how I would fell about gaiman taking the rains solo... I love gaiman but I never saw in him comedy genius 

Before their careers took off in the early ‘90s, Gaiman and Pratchett talked about writing a Good Omens sequel called 668: The Neighbor of the Beast. I don’t think they got much further than the title, though.

Should she actually exist and not be a sockpuppet account, it seems like she should first talk to people of color and more thoroughly examine the situation before jumping to the worst conclusion and calling it racism. I am not sure the claim is wrong that these names are insensitive, but I am quite confident that it’s…

Call me crazy, but I find it a bit more offensive and racist that a white woman is telling us why this is racist. As a Mexican, I was calling stuff Trader Jose’s before I knew they labeled stuff that. How about she lets people who may actually be offended by it say something.

I honestly always had the same impression as you—- that there was a “Joe” in every culture (some guy making delicious, culturally significant foods) and they were recognizing that.

But demanding that companies make symbolic gestures is so much easier than effecting systemic change, you see.

I always thought opposite, that it was inclusion? Someone please explain to me like I am 5...

Not saying that this teenage white woman is wrong, but maybe there are more important things to put your energy into right now.

Huh? if anything, I would think of it as them not having a white savior complex about foreign foods, or making it seem like “Joe” discovered them. I always saw the random little characters as a way of saying there are “Joes” in every culture.

I don’t know, it looks like proper thick clotted cream - the slightly runnier stuff you get under the crust. You’re right about the jam going on first though. It’s just logic! If you have a nice, warmed scone (which you should), and put the cream on first, it starts to melt and then you’re in danger of the whole lot…

Having read the novel many times and the watching the series, all I can say is that Gaiman is seriously over rated. Many of my favorite parts of the novel were completely left out of the series, including but not limited to the entire subplot that defines the main protagonist! Plus the other horsemen, how could you…

Side note: I mentioned this elsewhere, but...