rogerkillerpeck
RogerKillerPeck
rogerkillerpeck

Like others, I’m betting Balder. And the story will be based around the legend where Balder’s death was presaged, so the Norse gods got all of creations, rocks, plants, animals, etc., to pledge that they would not kill Balder. Loki discovered, however, that they had missed one thing: mistletoe. The Norse gods are so

“Arrow’s Bright Green Tease Was About Exactly What You Thought It Was”

I can’t believe they killed John Diggle by kryptonite poisoning.

Arrowverse/Blindspot/Stargate crossover confirmed!

So... do you find John Stewart to be the least interesting when he’s the only available lantern or in general?

let’s just have John Diggle remain John Diggle, rather than find some jump-through-hoops way to tie him as John Stewart.

This article is part of a strange trend, where Pulliam-Moore express puzzlement about something that is made 100% clear. It follows in the footsteps of him suggesting the Morbius trailer was “confusing as hell” because he was uncertain whether people were calling Spider-Man a murderer in the movie because he was

Do a little more research next time. The etymology shows that savage means nothing more than wild, things in history put other references to it, but savage is wild, period. That was literally the reason the “bad version” of the word exists, as pioneers called people “savages” because they were, in their minds, “Wild.”

The word “Savage” has never conjured up any ideas as you present them in your article. I think “ferocious” or “dangerous” mostly comes to mind. Now, I understand that there’s a bit of history here but seeing the devil in every detail makes the contemporary human being come across as a little immature. We can remember

First I was trying to understand if this was a joke article but it is not.

The word “savage,” furthermore, probably isn’t even that high on the list of pejoratives that Indigenous people want others to stop using, seeing as how hardly anyone uses “savage” in reference to them now.

This article reads like somebody had to write a 2,000-word essay for some 2000-level sociology class, then realized that they could throw an extra 400 words about a video game onto the top of it and turn it around to Kotaku for some beer money.
The beer is a locally-sourced IPA, of course. Bud Light is the drink of

As a person with indigenous ancestry, savage doesn’t bother me at all. Too many virtue signaling, white knight,sjw's  these days.

Oh god Paul this is a crime man.

To call a group of brown, Spanish speaking people “The Savages” is obviously a use of the word in a derogatory manner and an association that colonizers would’ve used. That’s ignorant. However, the word savage originates from meanings like ‘wild’ or ‘of woods and animals’ or

For the record I have not commented on any Kotaku article or any other news site that I go to for that matter, but I feel like this needs attention. Paul Tamayo should not be allowed to write for this site. The use of “savage” in a game title is not news. This is what I would consider to be click bait to rile people

I use “savage” in reference to animals; not people. A lion is savage. A T-Rex is savage. A bear is savage. A silverback is savage. People are not savage. Unless they bite? I associate the adjective “savage” with the verb “savage”, and I use the adjective to indicate propensity for the verb. This also applies

Savage as an adjective is just a way to describe something. Using it as a noun is where you get in trouble. But, describing a planet as savage is perfectly fine. I find it quite alarming that anyone would think otherwise.

Aand unsurprisingly a word that can be offensive to people in AMERICA mainly, is deemed offensive for everyone.

This won’t get past the grays, since most people are piling on at this point. But I’ll say this much as a counterpoint:

adjective =/= noun

man that seems like a lot of trouble to go through.