rogerkillerpeck
RogerKillerPeck
rogerkillerpeck

players who grinded their way

Not to mention, “players who grinded their way . . . .” 

Shouldn’t that be, “Latinx Xtory”?

Is it unreasonable to hate the Pontiac Aztek?

Because helping victims of violence doesn’t actually address the “supply side” issue of racial violence at all (if a neo-Nazi breaks your window, it does more good in the long run to get the neo-Nazi to stop breaking windows than it does to replace your window, since the neo-Nazi could just break it again)?

As another lawyer who frequents here, I appreciate you assuming the burden of referring people to Brandenburg v. Ohio (a decision in which the speaker pretty much called for a race war, albeit not using those specific words).

Yes, this casting is actually objectionable and pairing it with the Death Note critique does more to discredit accusations of whitewashing than it does to prove them.

Sorry, I thought that was a silly enough response that I didn’t need to add a “snark” tag to the end, but I guess not....

Drat, that should be “statues” rather than “statutes,” but since anarchists also want to remove statutes, I guess it still works....

Wow, I totally remember loving that ad as a kid! Especially the tootling pan pipe at the end.

I demand YouTube remove all videos filmed in portrait mode except for those videos where the use of portrait mode was a conscious artistic choice! Anything less is morally indistinguishable from the Holocaust!

Look the blood of innocent bystanders is a small price to pay for removing the greatest moral scourge in human history — statutes.

Since Whedon’s been on the Kinja shitlist since at least Avengers: Age of Ultron, I’m wagering on the latter.

Except in how many instances do you know who a business’ hosting company is?

People should work to correctly pronounce other people’s names as a matter of common courtesy, but at the same time I don’t have a lot sympathy for people who are adults and still get distressed by it when random strangers innocently struggle with the pronunciation of their name. I get to listen to my first name

That their activities apparently aren’t considered illegal is a bullshit (some would say intentional) quirk of the law.

Do you think every company handles 100% of its IT services in-house?

Except Lim never said any other companies had an obligation to host hate speech, nor did he even say his own company had an obligation to.

A selling point for his service is that it is hardened against denial of service attacks. He’s going to get business by proving via hosting the Daily Stormer that his service can survive attacks that would have nuked other providers offline.