robusto68
Robusto68
robusto68

Because a fine isn’t prevention. Also once the rules of net neutrality are repealed there’s no guarantee that such a fine would still stand if challenged.

So what you’re acknowledging is that what I described businesses doing, will happen.

No. If the ISP is owned by or owns a competing media outlet and they want that media outlet to outperform the media outlet you’re using what would stop them from throttling that media outlet? If you live in an area wherenyou have little or no choice in ISP what’s the downside for the ISP?

There is a difference between regulation and wholesale take over of the Internet by the govt. what you described has nothing to do with what is being discussed.

No busunless in their right mind would rob, poison or kill their customers but it happens all the time.

I explain it this way. Let’s say you’re a Netflix customer and your ISP owns or is owned by another major media company, they could slow down your network traffic for Netflix.

An Accused Admitted Sex Offender

I don’t like people playin on my phone!

“they met at various locations and were loaded into vans that took them to the farm”

This is not liberal handwringing. It’s just racism. It’s the same ground in systemic racism you see all throughout our media landscape. It’s the expectation that white people are good, when they’re not, that expectation of goodness still gets included in the coverage. The tone of incredulity along with the attempt to

And yet ANOTHER thing you can point to when some ignorant racist troll asks, “what systemic racism?”

The key thing that is revealed that I think clears this up is that Scott is not an employee and is currently under contract negotiations with Scott and probably is freaking out over the fact that as Scott’s newfound celebrity increases (by things like being interviewed by the press) the ability to demand more in his

there is something about the purity of a young woman, there is something that is good, that’s true, that’s straight and he looked for that

Whoo hoo I’m getting a new car and a European vacation!

I can see the GTA thing just being ignorant of the game, but letting a kid have access to your credit card... that’s insane.

Aren’t we mature enough to view the heroes of yesteryear in a more honest light? After all, what you seem to be calling for has been the standard for decades.

Would they adopt me?

I don’t consider myself Captain Responsible, but letting your kid have uncontrolled access to your credit card just seems monumentally stupid. Even if money weren’t an object.

Even though I think microtransactions and other assorted type purchases are dumb, if kids are paying for them with their own money, what’s the big deal? I mean, how is “designed to lure kids into spending money different from almost all advertising that’s geared towards kids?

“...YES WE ARE A CHURCH AND WE WILL PROTECT OUR PEOPLE... BECAUSE FUCK JESUS AND FUCK EVERYTHING WE’VE CONVINCED PEOPLE WE’RE GATHERED HERE TO REPRESENT SO WE CAN FLEECE THEM!