I have yet to watch the show, but isn’t the premise a parody of Back to the Future with Doc constantly requiring Marty to suck his dick?

telling the truth is one thing - portraying that truth as if it were unsafe, and then adding the moniker ‘pink slime’ to the product is where ABC was at fault.

Nope. Nope. Nope. ABC was in the wrong. Thats why they settled. You really think that a meat distribution company has more money than DISNEY? They settled because they knew they would lose in court.

vinyl is stupid

vinyl is stupid

if its in your bag sitting in the plastic tray, its far less likely

fuck this noise. I don’t trust any motherfuckers wearing pants at work. ANY.

but if you sit at a computer all day taking breaks to read lifehacker, aren’t your legs under a desk? Who are these mens’ hidden shins offending?

its not that big a deal to take it out. the issue is, when one of the X-ray jockeys decided to pick up said iPad and look at it, and they drop it. Or when they decide they need to swab it, and boom - liquid on the lightning port. Or better yet, when they decide to steal it and hope you don’t notice in all the hustle…

until this new change, you haven’t had to take a tablet out of your carry on bag for years.

I love the amazing designers who make the concept vehicles. But who are the shitty designers who turn those beautiful cars into the gross production vehicles?

Yup. Johnson (nader 2.0) ha taken the presidency from Clinton. Let every idiot Johnson/stein/protest voter know that they put Yrump in the Oval Office.

I really don’t see what all the hubbub is about. The jack is gone, who gives a shit. Use bluetooth headphones, use the lightning EarPods they give you or use the fucking adapter on whatever hell else you’d like. Wont cost anyone an extra penny, and they cover all the bases. I for one am glad to see that ancient hole…

You're correct, it IS about eight and wrong - and it is wrong for a peace officer to kill a suspect who hasn't been given their due process.

If there was clear and accurate evidence that the suspect was firing or about to fire at the officers, then yes - but unfortunately the police have cried wolf far too often.

I don’t know that to be the case - and though I'm sure it will appear on the police report, these days I tend to question the honesty of those.

He has spoken out about it, many times. Of course he has to take an incredibly diplomatic tone, and can't speak with fiery rhetoric. Your observation is biased and uninformed.

I'm not understanding your analogy... Are you claiming that Obama somehow endorsed this police shooting?

Removed the suspect from the vehicle and handcuffed him/her. The police doesn't need to be judge, jury and executioners:

The windshield was being shot at by the police officer to the right of the suspect’s vehicle - the glass isn't shooting outwards, but pieces are flying to the left of the truck, forced from the direction of the fire. The suspect was not firing, the officer using the shotgun was.

The news cut away from the valuable story, police abusing their power and murdering a suspect that was all but in custody.