Same kind of guy who complains that Burneko's recipes are too longwinded.

Oh, there's no doubt that snark sells. I totally get that. I just take issue with the lack of ownership of that position. Gawker embraces their position as the snark site of celebrity gossip and politics.

Opinion noted!

It is if you possess critical thinking and reading comprehension skills.

Oh, I read it. It was another long-winded screed that was just a defense of his indefensible piss-poor journalism.

Nope, but thanks for playing!

Alright, settle down, tiger. It's OK. I understand you're a little upset. Just watch what you type from now on. That's all.

Nope and again, missing the point. This is a bigger thing than this story. This story is not what I am discussing.

You appear to have missed the point.

You're totally missing the point.

Huh?

Ooooooooh, someone's getting catty.

To be clear, I'm talking about the posts that make it to Deadspin, not whatever you're apparently reading.

I absolutely agree with all of this.

When I say positive, I don't mean "MMA fighter rescues kids from burning building" or a glowing breakdown of the tightly run ships that are Bellator or the UFC.

When you make the assertion that much/most of what you post is positive, you're the one asking for people to take a look at the balance.

The point seems to have been missed.

On it's face, I agree with this. Wheel of Fortune is a luck/spelling show, not a reading show. Still, they guy didn't know how to pronounce Achilles, so it's hard to feel a lot of sympathy.

This is why anyone trying to prove their intelligence by stating what college they graduated from is probably dumb as a brick.

"...much of what we do post (about MMA) is positive."