"Crappy thing is that there will be no char customization i believe, this will be the story of a certain defined character, like the exiled son of gwyn or shit, so no females either"

This looks so promising. I love the atmosphere the video has. It just looks amazing.

Character creation hasn't been confirmed but it hasn't been shot down either. Don't talk speculation as if it were a fact.

Every game can have enemies ambush you in various ways. All of which have pretty much been done by a game - corners, bushes, darkness, smoke, descending from the clouds. None of that makes game design cheap.

IF the whole game was that - then I would agree with you. But the only area where darkness is an issue is Tomb…

Kristina Rose should play her in some movie.

The whole argument whether to pose is possible or not is retarded - Cammy can change her direction mid air, she can do all kinds of crazy shit. She can do this pose. Whoever has played SF, knows she is extremely flexible and likes showing her ass.

There is no western game with ladies in it, where there are no sexy ladies. But western games, for the greater part, try to add some substance to the character, where she's not just a shell in panties and a skirt that lifts up all the time. Look at The Witcher 2 - Triss is fucking hot. You can see Sile's left nipple…

You forgot to say you're a pedobear, just judging from your nickname.

Oh, you're right, the stories of the two Arkham games both are nothing impressive. The stories that is. The way the stories were told was what made them amazing. You could explain the story, tell it to anyone and it will sound mediocre at best, but when you play the game, just because of the means they used to tell…

Oh, whops.

Well, I like how you insult me because of a stupid joke, almost as if you took it seriously because you are totally unfunny person.

Your and my opinions are irrelevant... because nobody that matters will read or listen to them. People that matter in this case are the Bioshock games designers. An opinion that isn't heard by someone who matters in the field is irrelevant.

I thought it was in Florida before finishing the article, because the state name is in the headline.

Yeah, but that opinion is irrelevant, because the game is already a first person game. Yes, it will work fine in third person. However, it will be a different game... the camera matters. The difference between Dishonored and Assassin's Creed is the camera.

You didn't list one fps game. How about Dishonored? That is the only FPS in the history of FPS games that pulled off platforming successfully. Every other FPS that tried has sucked.

There IS a choice sure. It is purely aesthetic. If you don't like it - fine. It doesn't matter. Because it is aesthetic, and games AS AN ART AND NOT AS A SERVICE, need to make choices and stick by them. The contrast between the beauty of the game and the gruesome violence is awesome. It's not even the first game to…

But to be honest, if the next Xbox has always online DRM, it will be cracked, it will be chipped, it will be pirated. Pirates will again get superior service because corporations have no idea how this shit works.

My eklhs bawkhls tlhree sihlthly :D I had forgotten about this guy, he's hilarious.

If you don't like these practices - do not support them. I pirate everything I want to play but deploys any anti-consumer tactic. Always online DRM isn't really my biggest issue. It's not a scam if the game offers offline mode. Like, StarCraft 2's DRM is quite fine. And you can just crack the game if you don't like it.

…

If you're not happy about spending money on art, you shouldn't spend it. That is it. You always have the free option, or the option to remain lawful and just not buy their product. Games are art. They are not necessity, so if you don't like spending money on them - by all means don't. These companies are not stealing…