Look up the demo of Unreal Engine 4 and you'll understand everything he says. I'm not talking about the cutscene demo, I mean the tech demo, where a dude explains the engine.
Look up the demo of Unreal Engine 4 and you'll understand everything he says. I'm not talking about the cutscene demo, I mean the tech demo, where a dude explains the engine.
To be honest I love when franchises decide to shake things up a bit. I loved AC 3 for that. I could not play another AC game like the old ones. It was the same thing for 4 games. This is the case with Lara Croft as well - they started with a formula, made 5 games with it, then changed up. It was bad. But Tomb Raider…
Oh, yeah. The PC can do everything, I know that. I love the PC for everything it can do, and it is my favorite platform for gaming. I'm just saying that the PS4 is not bad at all. The tech demos show it can handle quite the load of things, and some more interesting ones showed it can be used for more than gaming.…
When developers find themselves having to SCALE DOWN graphics to release games on consoles, you know new technology is required. Think The Witcher 2, Crysis 3, which I think will also see current console release. For The Witcher 2 they had to take away parts of the decoration in levels to make the game run on consoles…
This isn't relevant really. I'm a PC user and gamer, but when we're comparing gaming platforms, other uses are irrelevant. Only gaming is. PS4 will have "Zbrush" on it, which means it will be valid 3D modelling platform. Who knows what more they can slap on it to make it something more than simple gaming console.
I know, I'm a PC gamer and digital artist. I bought my PC 2 years ago, it still runs every game on high details, except The Witcher 2... I have to disable ubersampling there. It also paid itself off already from the work I did on it. I love the PC. But the PS4 is not a bad piece of tech. It is stronger than the…
I hope this isn't like TR:Legend's next gen mode that didn't work on release and had to be patched. But it actually doesn't require that strong PC. I'll run it on max details on my almost 2 years old machine.
If the game is coded to use quad core, it damn makes difference. You can also modify which core(s) the game uses, which is quite nice. You can at least have a core dedicated to the game itself, and another one to take care of everything else.
Explain to me how you can build a PC that is just as good in every aspect as the PS4 for the price of a PS4.
It's not about the graphics. It's about technical restrictions, which are lifted. Many games are developed with these in mind - from polygon count, to the amount of objects with enabled physics that the game can handle. The biggest has always been Serious Sam, it could handle armies with physics to each unit, have…
Homefront sucks. Not worth the $60 but for whole different reason, not the length of the campaign. If the multiplayer was good, that's enough of a reason to justify the price, though. Bulletstorm is worth $60 for the campaign. To me that game has insane replayability. So does PoP: The Two Thrones for some reason. I've…
So, with eavesdropping you're complaining that the game gives you restrictions, which are the challenge? I liked the missions as a challenge... and for every eavesdrop, there are multiple routes or ways to do it. Despite the small zone you have to stay in so you can actually hear what the guys say, you still have…
I'm with you on this, I love seeing graphics improve and games becoming better in every aspect, graphics included. But I think it is just people used to a certain generation feeling intimidated by the new one. It's nothing special, when games with very realistic graphics come, they will like them no matter what they…
Look like ZBrush for PS4. Which is a good thing. I mean, sculpting dynamically like that creates millions of polygons, and if they, and I hope they do, use something like ZBrush's dynamesh, you will have the sculpture dynamically adding polygons all the time. It is heavier than it looks, and to me it looks cool. Not a…
The Witcher 3 has been announced for all high end platforms when it comes out, so yes, it will be on consoles. The Witcher 2 also is, and although they had to step down the graphics for the port, I hear it is stellar to the point where it controls better than the PC version.
Diablo 1 was on the PS. Enough said.
You don't see how a console that can render a million objects interacting can be beneficial to gaming? More power behind the machine means technically better games. Games that won't have the technical limits they have right now. A game, where it can rain frogs and you can see every frog interact with the surface it…
The PS4 beats the vast majority of PCs out there. There are PCs stronger than it, but they aren't that many. It definitely beats any PC that will cost as much as the PS4 itself. The other game they showed, with the robot looks more impressive than these screenshots here, though. I mean, it looks almost like a movie,…
What does the PC thing stand for? Regular PC? So this is like a console PC or something? God I hope so. If the PS3 architecture is more PC friendly, maybe we'll be having some good PC ports coming our way.
Our hobby is thrashed left and right. I know the reporters aren't jumping to conclusions, but they're also quite sly. The girl from the four teenagers that talked, said what I think exactly - if there weren't video games, I would be hurting people.