robotpanda
Robot Panda
robotpanda

Point in the matter is - I am not making Valve's policies on games with child rape in them. I am just a person, and you're just a person and we have to talk on that level. You know all too well what I mean by filthy, as a human being and you're trying to transcend above that to some objective being and try to argue me

Can you please just be a person and talk in your own thoughts, instead of trying to be somewhat objective, which you aren't?

She apparently didn't do anything. They claimed she deleted "evidence" in the form of e-mails from her to whatever, so these e-mails should still exist on the receivers' end. If they can be used to blame her for anything, Wardell has access to them. Now, apparently he's just a boss that can't be a boss and respect his

The games in gun shops thing doesn't stand really. Just like sex games, and butt plugs, violent games do not make people to go hurt someone in a bad way. It's not about violence and it's special place, it's about the tools used for the specific purpose of terrorizing or killing real people having their own place where

It's just I was disappointed that I really expected gameplay, not a cutscene, and probably that's where my disappointment came from. The game looks really pretty though, I can't say it looks bad... I thought that was cinematic at first, then realized it's the ingame engine.

Sex games on Steam is like butt sex toys being sold next to coca-cola in Walmart. You don't buy this stuff there, you buy it from a sex shop. I won't mind a Steam-like platform exclusively for sex games. I have zero doubt it will be successful if someone starts it.

Oh, you're right. I won't disagree with you on FPSs, or most genres in that matter. That's why I call games like Metal Slug, Serious Sam, Painkiller, etc. 'stress relievers', because it is just simple violence that helps me get stress off me. For me,this is positive because I'm not out hurting people. But those games

I see your point and you would be completely right if people were reasonable. But they're not. There is not a single portal for any form of art, which I consider games to be, that hasn't gone down the shithole after going open to simple nudity, and this is because of the thin and very subjective line that separates

For the sake of this post, I'll refer to dating sims as sex games. I know not all are, but we know that this game is.

Zzz, just go drink two bottles of beer, and the next night slurp two bottles with a straw and tell me the difference.

I remember that with both MSG 1 and 2 I could get fast into the game and let it grab me. True, I never finished an MSG game, I said I played them. They just let me get to playing fast enough, before I get bored from the cutscene. For the first, I actually didn't finish it because I started the 2nd and while playing

Okay, this is gizmodo and not kotaku, but I'll use games to explain myself. If EA patented first person perspective, because it is not patented and they can do it, they can sue Activision for making an FPS and no other than EA would be allowed to make FPS games. So, do you see the problem? In games, same as

Yeah, I stand corrected. It's the very last sentence of the article, and I didn't read that. My mistake.

The thing I would disagree on is that drinking slower makes you less drunk. With beer, the slower you drunk, the more drunk you get from the same amount of alcohol. Try sucking it through a straw or slurping it with a teaspoon. This gets you extremely drunk from small amount of beer.

Decent companies work with about an year in advance plan. The fact that they said they'll release 4 DLCs in the future means they have already planned out the idea of these 4 DLCs. All companies work like that with long term plans. It is actually awesome of Gearbox to reveal some of it.

7 is simply amazing. XP is 11 years old now I think, it is about time they started dropping support for it in favor of prettier games.

So instead of fixing her pacemaker, they just leave her hanging upside down? Don't these things have warranty or something? This issue is something that can most likely be fixed, no need to disable the woman from being normal just because... they shouldn't even charge her to fix her up.

I remember playing Metal Gear 1 & 2, and none of them had 9:20 minutes long cutscenes. if my memory is right. When I read 11 minutes of gameplay, I expected more than actually less than 2 minutes. Rhe game looks pretty indeed, especially knowing that all this is rendered in the engine, it doesn't look like it's a

Well, it *seems to me* that Apple is pulling off a scheme to destroy competition. It started with the almost innocent patents they got a while back, which are the reason these lawsuits hold any ground. If my memory serves, Apple pretty much has the patent over any rectangle surface with a screen, and they just want to

Doesn't the US have a law against monopoly (not sure if spelling is right, I don't mean the game), where a company cannot sue another company for being competition? Because that is what Apple seems to be doing right now. They're suing Samsung, because they're losing sales to it, just like they're losing sales to PCs.