I will put a fiver on “Well, you see, the movie is actually anti-woke!”

You know perfectly well what they mean, and it’s absolutely an appropriate use of that word.

“Harrison For Reacts to New Species Being Named After Indiana Jones’ Least Favorite Animal”

In the books, he actually can! He’s just not nearly as powerful during the day as he is at night.

It’s not really that surprising. Pretty much every villain of the corrupt businessman variety from the late ‘80s and early ‘90s was based to some degree on Trump.

Wow, today I learned there was a Bubsy 4. Hell, today I learned there was, presumably, a Bubsy 3.

I don’t know if you’re just joking or already know this, but that’s basically what happens in the books, yeah. The captain lashed his hands holding a crucifix to the ship’s wheel so that, even after the captain died, Dracula couldn’t have directly steered the ship even if he wanted to. He had to make the storm winds…

Maybe they can have some sort of one-minute mini-episode: Gorn in 60 Seconds.

I maintain that Weird Barbie should be a DIY kit including a regular Barbie, a pack of markers, and a pair of scissors.

“Sir, the sailors have been disappearing during the night, and the man on watch says he saw a strange figure walking on deck after midnight!”

Nah, copyright is not determined by usage. Once Steamboat Willie enters public domain, that specific version of Mickey Mouse will enter it as well. Now, anything that Disney added to the character’s design or story after that will not be public domain. That includes design elements like the white gloves, his…

I think the odd part was that it was an independent film that wasn’t made by one of the big studios, like basically every comic book movie nowadays. It does seem even odder considering that, as you say, the Turtles were a genuine cultural phenomenon at the time.

Yeah, there was a lot of genuinely good stuff there. I think the plot would’ve worked a lot better if they had cut the opening scene giving Yaotl’s backstory. It made the later exposition feel redundant, and it also basically let us know that he wasn’t actually evil right at the outset, which was much later treated…

“I don’t know that it’s necessarily going to be darker. It’s just going to be unique — more of like a Being John Malkovich or an Adaptation,” she says, referencing the 1999 and 2002 Spike Jonze films. “Any movie that has Barney is not certainly going to be straightforward. We’re not making Ted. You know what I…

Of all the many and myriad ways that the wealthy use to avoid paying taxes, write-offs from actual donations to legitimate non-profits are the absolute least of the problem. And, in terms of “he could’ve done it anonymously,” it’s true, he could have, but there is a great deal of value in a public, high-profile…

Sure, why not? A single player on a team can have a great game, even if the team loses.

What’s obvious? That a person who donates to a non-profit should avoid writing off the donation on their taxes in order to, what, prove that their motives are “pure”? As someone who has worked in non-profits for twenty years, let me ask you: why do you want us to get less money in donations?

Oh, has it? Well, shows how often I used Twitter. It does explain why the logo and the background are such drastically different styles, though.

...what am I supposed to be looking at here? Was there supposed to be an image?

If it weren’t for the fact that he’s been holding on to the concept of X.com for more than twenty years (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.com), I’d be tempted to think that they had a brainstorming session for a new name but then accidentally put it live without replacing the placeholder.