robertosauras
robertosauras
robertosauras

Let’s really call them what they are. Extremist...... Interstellar...... Aliens....... Extremist........ Interstellar........ Aliens......... Why can’t they call them just what they are? We need to get rid of this terrestrial correctness and call it what it is.

Or they could have existed a billion years ago or a billion years in the future and we’d never exist at the same time.

I’m not a Beyonce stan, but if she continues to perform and drive that racist vampiric clown Rudy Guliani insane until someone drives a stake through his black heart, I’ll buy all of her albums.

Rudy Giuliani or an aged Travis Bickle who somehow survives the movie and crawls out of a television in Queens

Study after study after study has shown that the aggressive policing tactics used by the NYPD under Giuliani did not reduce violent crime relative to the decreases that occurred in other cities not using these methods. At all. The entire decline can be chalked up to demographic changes. (Being an economist by training

I find it weird when white people are open enough in their racism to hate on Beyoncé. I mean, as far as public figures go, she’s pretty wholesome as well as being obviously talented as all hell, and everyone’s suburban mom loves her music. But, like, even she’s still all terrifyingly BLACK to a fair percentage of the

Yeah that’s really weird, it must be a coincidence ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

So huh has anyone else noticed that some of Donald Trump’s supporters seem to be vile racist pigs?

Also, Cat’s in the Cradle is just a flat-out garbage song. Play catch with the other kids you weirdo.

She’s not assuming anything.

Gail Sheehy? Holy crap. I hope she can write often for Jezebel—she is a towering figure.

But there’s a serious difference between something like Halliburton stock and the charity. Stock means direct personal profit, while a charity doesn’t. No one’s ever really explained how the Clintons personally benefit from the foundation, beyond conspiracies and money laundering.

All closing the foundation would do is prove to the right wing that they were right and it was corrupt. Meanwhile, a shit load of people would suffer and lots of good programs would stop.

That’s a pretty stupid conclusion to draw. She accepted that public speaking money because that was her job and her main source of income at the time. If someone offers you money to give a speech, you take that money and give the speech. There’s no conflict of interest because she wasn’t consulting them on anything.

And the question still remains how many of those people she would have met with even if they hadn’t donated.

I kind of hate how shitty Gawker writers are now writing for Deadspin about crap that has nothing to do with sports.

Yes, let’s shut down a charity that provides money for the poorest people in the entire world because Hillary met with 85 people who had donated to the foundation while she was sec. of state. Ehrmahgod, 85 people! That’s like, such a huge percentage of the number of people that the top diplomat of the world’s most

+1 Clinton Global Initiative and Clinton Fund are two charities doing what charities do - taking in money and spending that on impoverished people.

Exactly. The Clinton Foundation is objectively a well-run charitable organization putting its funds to good use. The optics of it are entirely separate from the fact that it’s actually helping people who need help.

Counterpoint: No.