HEY! Don’t insult garbage people by comparing them to the Kardashians

You actually watched 20 scenes of this vapid show.

Translation: Garbage people doing garbage things to other garbage people.

Man we get it...It is wrong to attack someone (that goes for both parties), especially when they are far inferior to you. HE FUCKED UP...But what are the right consequences and actions to do now that it has happened? Chop off his fist? Put him in prison for the rest of his life? The team/university levied their…

Wow. Pointing out pertinent details that Muskovitz conveniently omitted from her post doesn’t justify telling someone to delete his/her account. If a levelheaded reveal of all of the facts doesn’t qualify to you as appropriate commentary, maybe you should delete YOUR account.

No. She pushed, slapped and potentially called him a racial slur.

“if something is unjustified, then there’s nothing that justifies it so nothing that came before matters because the action cannot be justified by it.”

Sorry, but we have progressed past the Stone Age. We have more than pointy sticks to shake at each other, and size isn’t all that matters. As an aside, you are letting the outcome bias your opinion. A smaller person shoves, and then slaps a larger one - can the larger one respond with a punch or not? If not, then I’d…

Yeah, no. Victim blaming would be saying he did nothing wrong. Everyone agrees he did something wrong. We’re talking about including the motive in the story. Journalists and reporters quite frequently include the motives of perpetrators in their stories when the motive does nothing to justify the criminal action (ex:…

TIL that the proper response to a verbal slur is physical assault (push followed by a face slap).

The OAB has been fighting to make the video public; Molitor spoke in part to possibly stop the push to get the video released.

Nuance matters, genius. Perhaps it is time to delete your account.

At the risk (especially on this site) of the drone-like trolls, I’ll point out some information and perhaps the other side of the argument.

Definitely a good point (thanks for the info btw), but it’s weird there’s no public reason given. You’d think SOMEONE would have asked her why she doesn’t want it out there.

From the article: “29 months after Sooner tailback Joe Mixon slugged Molitor in the wee hours at Pickleman’s Cafe, rearranging not just her face but her life,...”

I think that Deadspin has a responsibility to add an important detail to this story - that Molitor instigated the confrontation by physically striking Mixon twice. Now, having said that, there is no godly reason Mixon should have responded with the force that he did. 8 billion other ways to physically restrain somone…

There is also the fact that she admits to striking him first. Maybe she’s afraid to lose some of the PR battle if it’s obvious she was the instigator of violence (this is in no way a defense of Mixon, a shithead who responded to a woman pushing his face by caving in her jaw, just stating the facts of the case that…

It was also reported that she made the first two acts of physical violence - first shoving him, then slapping him across the face. I can imagine that would be a pretty good reason for her to want it suppressed.

Oh man he just stole all the thunder for the night. It’s all anyone will care about.

How...how on earth did that happen??? All power to him, but HOW DID THE SECURITY OF THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS let a known left-wing talk show host, in a bizarre costume, onto the stage? Let alone leave him at the damn podium long enough to give a satirical speech?? Jesus, no wonder they didn’t want guns there.…