It still does fine, just not as huge as it was in the first few seasons (which were helped by being in the shadow of Breaking Bad's enormously-rated final season.) Mad Men was never a big ratings hit either but it managed to last 7 seasons, no way AMC would give the follow-up to one of their signature shows the shaft.

That's really not true at all. Most Bernie supporters were young millennial Brooklyn-y types, exactly the type of audience Broad City appeals to.

God Piscatella's storyline was so weird. I thought his flashback would end with his "lover" betraying him (which would explain his hatred of inmates although still pretty cartoonishly) but instead it was like "Piscatella is a sociopath also did you know he's gay?".

Apparently she only has 3 months left so I am curious as to how they're stretching that out over 2 more seasons. I wouldn't mind if S6 was our last at the prison and S7 was an epilogue season of sorts.

I think typically they can separate comedy from drama by playing comedy during the times that are lighter on major plot development and going full drama when they need to. But since this entire season is focused on a major dramatic development they feel the need to shoehorn comedy in at random moments, and it just…

I think the biggest issue is the comments section. With past Netflix reviews there was a central discussion when each episode was posted. Now that they're all posted at the same time the discussion is kind of gone.

This season is the most tolerable she's been since, at the very latest, S2.

Yeah it felt really weird to see Taystee's past without Vee.

When they first introduced her backstory I genuinely thought that was the situation because imaging Krakowski as Native was just too ridiculous.

Giving away major plot points is a "massive spoiler." Using descriptive words to describe an episode is not a spoiler. This headline is no more spoiler-y than an episode description on a channel guide.

I thought this finale was a little bit of a mess. The Francesca plotline is a drag and makes both of the characters seem unlikable. The sexual harassment storyline was interesting but underdeveloped because the episode had to spend so much time focusing on the boring love plot.

Rachel was actually a fully realized character and their relationship felt real rather than plot mandated. Aziz still gets parts of romance right (this show has the most realistic fighting scenes I've ever seen on TV) but unfortunately Francesca was never developed enough for their relationship to ever justify why we…

Yep. "Extremely privileged college kids who are obsessed with calling out other people's privileges without acknowledging their own" is a group of people that are very real, probably at Columbia and very ripe for parody, but the show never really got there, and instead stuck with pretty surface-level "haha SJWs!!!!"…

Oh wow, I didn't see it at the time but Wendy is *very* Rebecca Bunch.

The trial episodes are still the low point of the show for me, for this reason. (Other than the geisha episode.)

Episode 6 has more of what people are complaining about.

UKS has never really treated Kimmy's trauma as a source of laughs. It's a silly show but that part of it has always been taken very seriously.

I also thought S2 was better than S1. It was a little darker and dealt with the show's themes better while still managing to be light and funny. And Tina Fey's therapist character was one of the best things the show has done yet.

Broad City is the only show that really gets that aspect of it right. Even their apartments are kind of shitty.

One of the little details about this that I liked was that all of the dates had some good and bad qualities. Like, Priya could've been "that horrible date who's on the phone the entire time" but they actually had good chemistry. Aparna's character could've been "total fucking weirdo" and yet they actually had some…