This screenshot messes with my brain

If that were the case, we’d have seen them the last four years.

“I don’t know of an easy explanation for less seatbelt use.”

“But the fact that charges are the same for a person living 30 miles from the factory being the same for someone living on the other side of the country suggests it’s all profits for automakers.”

“Are we the bad guy?”

Chicken wire fencing wouldn’t be my first choice for air vents.

It looks like one of those made-up cars featured on bottles of car polish at Pep Boys.

Not a slide show?

It might be time for the feds to start cracking down on so-called “self-driving” tech if Tesla’s going to keep using its customers as 65 mph beta testers.

Much as I love driving some of them, the options pricing on high-end European cars has reached comedic levels. See: Ferrari charging almost $4k for Apple CarPlay, Porsche’s $600 leather air vents, Germans charging premiums for items that are standard in a midsize Hyundai, etc.

Yep, and their track record on new releases is worse than Tesla’s.  Don’t screw this one up, Ford. 

1st gear: The “jobs at risk argument” is typical union BS. Apply that logic broadly and we just have a bunch of people sitting around watching technology work. I mean I get why the union is worried about jobs. It’s those hard workers who get the privilege of paying a portion of their earned wage to support the union.

Probably not, given that Tesla fans also crossover with Tesla stock investors, which makes for a pretty intense following, given that there is actual potential for huge financial reward or loss for Tesla’s success  or failure.

fine i am wrong.

It gains a thing that most people want - a better, more upright seating position and easier ingress and egress.  It’s non-trivial. 

I don’t know if zippy fits. But...

GM recently said it’s finally settled on a “permanent” solution for the Bolt’s issues that, once again, involves more software to fix a problem confirmed to be caused by a physical manufacturing defect.

Wrong, they all have plenty of entry level vehicles with good fuel economy. Today, they are compact & subcompact SUVs, when before they would’ve been small sedans and hatchbacks. But nobody actually wanted small sedans and hatchbacks...

Those that scoffed at Sergio Marchionne, when he stated that FCA was no longer going to offer cheap and simple sedans like the Dodge Dart or Chrysler 200, are the same ones that panned those vehicles.

Did I read this as Taylor Swift at first glance? Yes.