Not really.  I’ll watch his show every once in a while when he has a guest I’m interested in but he says some dumb things and the complaints about him platforming unsavory people are valid.  But when people engage with things using stupid arguments (like this article seemed to) I sort of can’t help myself even if it…

And yet this article was written about it and we’re this deep into the comment section about it.

The point of any political debate is to determine what kind of future any given proposal or candidate will bring.

Uhhh, yeah.  Why build a strawman when the actual point someone is making is a perfectly valid target?

He never even said he was talking about himself and he’s not talking about losing followers, he’s talking about philosophies about privilege checking and “making room for minority voices.”  It’s a dumb argument but can we at least respond to the argument he’s actually making?

So what are you proposing Democrats do about it?  

But he isn’t claiming that he, personally, has been silenced. He’s projecting the implications of certain attitudes within the culture.  

Liberal policies can be popular but if they people don’t actually vote for them because they’re turned off by the messaging it doesn’t matter at all. 

I was referring to this video:

People seem to be rather willfully misunderstanding this. He’s making a (perhaps dubious) slippery slope argument (“It keeps going further and further down the line and if you get to the point where you capitulate, where you agree to all these demands, it’ll eventually get to...”). Saying that Rogen has a rather large…

But ContraPoints invoked that phrase in the face of a wave of mass harassments directed towards her by people demanding she be canceled for not being woke enough on certain topics.  Have you watched her video on the topic?

Big Bird was on weekend update after Mitt Romney threatened to cut PBS funding during one of the debates.

Funny, I’d say this handled the “two part finale” thing among the worst and fell into the same trap a lot of movies that try to do that fall into: namely having a second part that feels more like an extended action climax than an actual movie. The Matrix Revolutions and The Battle of the Five Armies had the same…

It’s almost as if he’s consciously taking divergent roles to avoid typecasting...

I’d say The Mummy (2017) is pretty close to unwatchable and while it has its defenders I’d say Legend is also no good. Probably noteworthy that Cruise is completely miscast in both of those.

Isn’t bitcoin just fake internet money?  What does producing that have to do with coal?

Clearly she’s determined that anyone who was going to give a fuck has already abandoned her and is now just going to shout “fake news” to the ride or dies.

So?  Even in airplanes that have literal auto-pilot the pilots are still supposed to sit in the cockpit and keep your eyes on things.

It’s not like she literally needed to be in the same room with him...

She’s in as part of “Ike and Tina Turner,” which I think most voters thought was enough.  A lot of that 80s solo stuff was kind of over-produced and didn’t fit too great into pre-poptimist critical taste.