My concern is that you feel that a persons emotional response or personal distaste for certain cinematic choices are somehow less valid because you do not share the same response or distaste.

I feel like a majority of the people treating this like some huge, game-changing gaffe must not be from Ohio? Let me walk you through the thought process here.

The entire point of art is to evoke an emotional reaction. To take you on a journey. To immerse you.

The city in which I live bounced back quickly from the housing collapse. Developers invested heavily in building luxury rentals throughout the city and as a result (which should be a surprise to no one) rental costs have skyrocketed.

At this point you’re just vomiting out tired right-wing lies. You’re pointing out the exception and using it as a way to say the rule doesn’t exist... which is just bullshit.

I doubt we’ll ever see any moment on the “Trump is mentally unfit” aspect of invoking the 25th Amendment. You can probably split the Republican members of Congress into two categories:

Based on your other comments I doubt you’re open to any actual discussion on this, so my response is not for you. My response is for anyone who perhaps is leaning toward your perspective but has not yet solidified their position at a QAnon rally.

It backfired because you kind of stepped into the pile of shit that is discourse on racism on the internet. No one ever bothers to talk about what definition they are using.

Or perhaps Police have been conditioned through institutional racism to perceive persons of color as innately dangerous and white people as innately trustworthy?

@kenstories - I am inclined to interpret it in that way too, but the tweets have no additional context to really inform the reader if they are glib jokes, or something that Jeong truly believes.

... I was referring to the person referenced in the Tweet embedded in the above article; their handle is ‘Garbage Human’

It’s not Racism; it might be racism. That’s the problem with the word. At its most basic level racism (little ‘r’) just means ‘a prejudice based on race’. Under that definition anyone can be (and often is) racist.

you already pay a monthly fee and are tied to them by contract, why would you have to wait.

I think if we’re talking about who is more willing to coexist... the answer for the United States is simple: None of them.

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,

So on this note; my husband and I don’t watch a lot of live television but this past weekend we were being really lazy and just sat down and watched whatever was on.

I pay $60/month right now just for dental coverage for my spouse and I. And that plan? The first 6 months of every year have reduced coverage until I’ve ‘paid in’ enough.

To clarify my earlier comment: NEW drugs and procedures aren’t always immediately covered by single-payer systems. Not until they can show that they are objectively superior anyway.

The current system requires your insurance to sign off on an MRI for them to cover any of it. Even if they do cover it, it’s usually not covered until after you’ve made your deductible.... which could be thousands.

I’m not sure how the pharmaceutical industry would pivot... but I suspect for the Health Insurance industry it would be as simple as transitioning from ‘full’ plans to ‘enhancement’ plans. Instead of offering you insurance coverage they would just offer you a supplemental package... maybe it covers drugs that Single…