are there even any pictures of her not cleavage-focused that they could have used?

you don’t really know that though. for all we know this guy might have roms for some rare games that you can’t find anywhere that he never posted online. we don’t know what’s actually in his personal collection.

And how on earth could they possibly enforce that?  This just sounds like empty posturing just for the sake of it.

Just as a general rule of thumb, folks, if you see a dude with blue and/or pink hair (and they're not cosplaying), keep your kids far away from them.

Honestly, The Headline and the picture tell me everything I need to know. This guy is disgusting.

Good luck to him in Brazilian prison. I’m sure his crime and his outlandish hair and beard color will let him slide under the radar for the duration of his hopefully very long sentence.

Good on you, Burbank. You did nothing to betray the community. You played it smart and held your cards until it was time. 

From Merriam-Webster:

No, NFTs are bullshit. The technology that powers them devours electricity and the only “ownership” they offer is contingent on the services that verify said ownership and deliver said content continuing to operate in perpetuity.

I think if you’re starting fires to take credit for putting them out, it’s generally considered bad and does change the situation.

“allegedly posing”

How can it be ALLEGEDLY when it’s RIGHT THERE IN THE PICTURE?! This is clearly not photoshopped...

Lol. None of this has anything to do with “maturity”. I was making a dig at Nathan over his clear bias and more subtlely at his past history where he may or may not have shown the same bias.

The people who already bought the game, and have had it changed because of snowflakes can’t “take their money elsewhere”. So unless Steam begins to refund people for a game they bought four years ago, you are the one who should shut up.

I’m convinced Nathan will only stop posting about her if he gets to Bang her lol.

look, i get it, you’re a perv and want to perv out. no judgment here. She’s hot. doesn’t make you a moral crusader. this is trash-tier content that isn’t worth fighting over. i just wanted to point out that a not insignificant number of people in this space have complained for years about oversexualization. This just…

and I thought that was gross too. A lot of people called out Kojima for this, and for his subsequent “justification” that was meant to make us “ashamed of our words and deeds.”

“Provocative streamer always trying to go right to the edge of the line, crosses the line and is banned.

do these bitches know about chaturbate?

“For onlookers, this might seem like another ploy for attention”

How many times does this chick need to get banned before being kicked off the site?