rickysixx6
Super Nintendo Chalmers
rickysixx6

That is unlikely, it would open up a can of worms. Not only does it beg the cops to ask a myriad of questions like where are the documents? Why wasn't it reported sooner, etc.. but then there's the pesky issue of evidence and what type of evidence would exist to show the car was broken in to or stolen from the

Tavarish: Yea, do it... it'll be fun and cheap...

The reason you do this is simple:

You boys are slippin' ...

Brian O'Conner (Paul Walker): ... "Nah man, I think I'm going to chill now. You know, I've got a pregnant girl friend and a family to start thinking about"

When the President of Uber does it, you get David Lavrinc's panties tied and twisted but when the next psychopath running for President does it, he's rocking the vote!

Dick Clark: Let's see if we can help you out...

As far as I'm concerned, the Boys at McLaren can go f**k themselves.

I'd love to make a movie out of this one...

California ruined him.

That's your next top 10 list!

While 10% ethanol in Fuel is reeking havoc on engines, fuel tanks, lines, etc.. and cash for clunkers did no one any favors when it came to a manipulated surge in new car sales, my point, the point you replied to, was a statement on the ill effects of private industry being told what to do by Govt Bureaucracies more

Yes, 100% correct. Now tell me, do you need to spend billions on a Govt bureaucracy like the EPA to force that issue when a person "should" be able to go to a court room and defend the air they breathe sucks because a company produces a pollutant that exceeds what one would deem reasonable?

exactly.. not to mention that the fruits of technology should be a cheaper product that performs better and faster than its predecessor. The natural state of capitalism in this case should have resulted in an inflation adjusted cheaper corvette that is faster and "better".

I didn't say it happens over night. Its obvious that despite the gargantuan benefits of the industrial revolution, pollution was a growing concern but unfortunately science & society took it's time to prove its point while the court system was slow in protecting obvious property rights. I agree though, the EPA did

We don't disagree. I would merely argue that having private property laws with an honest and working court system would be more than enough "regulation" without any of the waste that comes with bureaucracies.

I know this may be difficult to grasp but natural regulations do exist and chief amongst them is one's right to be free and to be free in protecting their private property.

All I can try to be is consistent and I find hypocrisy to be repulsive when it comes to people espousing freedom and freedom of choice and then at the same time embracing a Govt Bureaucrat making business and life decisions on behalf of people (the market) that could make those choices themselves.

HAHA... right, because Lobbyists writing laws for Politicians is a "conspiracy" LOL