Meh. I’m in my thirties and already kind of falling apart. Honestly not really looking forward to my eighties at this rate.

3rd Gear: I’m also “hoping” to be a billionaire, but here we are.

The price is right if the most mediocre Corvette is your thing. But the complete lack of description gives me some pause. Very slightly no dice.

You could just not click on these articles?

Jeep has been steadily moving away from the misappropriated Native American tribe branding for years, and it’s frankly just weird that they’re so resistant to change on this last one.

“They love us! They love us so much, they’re practically begging us to use the name!”

Reverse: Wild, impractical, vaguely futuristic cars aren’t going to fund themselves, and in the 80s, companies actually had to show profits to continue existing.

Yeah, they’re already here in the comments pretending the driver was in imminent risk of being murdered by the strikers. Fucking absurd.

Yeah that’s my thing here. For every possible reason you might want this car, there’s a better option available at the same price point.

Given that everybody seems to wear smart watches these days, that really curtails your horological options there.

Man that’s a big “Probably.”

Right, I get that part, but I don’t understand why someone would buy a Jeep over a Range Rover or Mercedes at this kind of price point.

You can ride my coattails anytime, if you know what I mean.

Who is this thing even for? I just don’t understand the point of this car.

I’ll take “Worst Takes of the Century” for $1000, Alex.

I missed the $80k price tag. Whoof.

This is honestly the worst kind of history. Preserving something without context when it wouldn’t be worth preserving even if it was contextualized. This is just silly.

So, so many reasons.

This whole article reads like ad copy. Is this sponsored content?

Mrs. Ghost and I have actually bought two cars during the pandemic, one new and one used.