richardcadman
Mav
richardcadman

The vast amount of porn and fanfic of these characters disagree with you.

People want PvE because they want more story scenarios featuring these characters that aren’t vague nonsense hinted at by trailers.  It’s a big reason why people got so upset about Overwatch 2.0

Ohh, won’t someone think of all the BG3 fans that don’t know what the Forgotten Realms are?

*Cracks knuckle*

Yea... these are 100% pitch/concept trailers. Let's not try to get into a whole "Sony/Insomniac have a finished Spider-Man multiplayer game they refuse to release or scrapped at the last minute to save money" conspiracy. 

Eh, on a superficial level, it's similar to x-com. I'd put it in the same genre, at least.

The idea of a multiplayer Spider-Man game that allows you to play as the multiverse of spider-beings sounds pretty cool. But not cool enough that I’d suffer through a live service game for it. 

I mean Hitler was a monster, full stop, but”

(record scratch)

“I’m in no way defending horrible people”
*proceeds to simp for horrible people*

What is your point here, exactly?   

There’s a reason why they have been “talking” about it for 17 years and it still isn’t anywhere near happening:

The Batman comes really close. While I dont love the movie, I do really like that it was 100% about him learning that being about Vengeance is the thing that makes the serial killer ridler identify with him, and that he needed to find a better way, to try ot be a hero, etc. . . .

Batman is not the one with the God complex - that’s your pet Hero, Superman. (in the mess of thinly veiled Jesus metaphor you directed, at least). But then again he couldn’t even agree to Superman not killing people, so there’s that.

Once again, we have another proof of how shallow a thinker Snyder is. Not dumb, but shallow. He thinks he can analyze a story, but he cannot pierce beyond the most obvious symbolism.

I’m very surprised if that is something DC actually said to Snyder at any point, because it is absolutely arse-backwards from how it should actually work. It’s not “This character doesn’t kill, so don’t put him in a situation where he has to”, it’s “This character doesn’t kill, so put him in a situation where he has

I really hate when people like this insist that a superhero not killing their enemies, or a superhero being kind, or a superhero not being a raging sociopath, is unrealistic and therefore should be abandoned. The entire fucking concept of superheros is unrealistic, very much including the so-called “grounded” heroes

False. A Batman who won’t kill is still very relevant, and a Batman who kills could be interesting if you actually explore what it would do to both him and his supporting cast.

You sound fun at parties.

Pepe could pull it off. 

I was a teenager when the Prequels came out, and at the time I was totally swept up in their cultural zeitgeist. I was a prequel-apologist for a couple of summers, and was always willing to overlook those films’ flaws because “Episode III is going to fix everything.” And while Revenge of the Sith is certainly the best

Despite it being convoluted and patchwork, this EU version of things makes sense if you consider that Palpatine wouldn’t have the plans available anywhere easily accessible. The rebels got everything piecemeal from a bunch of different sources of ancillary data instead of one convenient floppy disk.