the biggest tell is them trying to have us believe they ever cared about Morph.
the biggest tell is them trying to have us believe they ever cared about Morph.
I mean, if they fit the content profile for multiple sites, why wouldn’t they be duplicated? Otherwise they either pay two people to do the same job or only post it on one site, limiting its exposure to possibly interested readers.
So everybody wins, except the console warriors.
In work so couldn’t read the article yet, but could this be because starfield didn’t perform as well as they wanted? So now they're realising that maybe releasing it on both is the best option to make as much as possible
hey you know what DRM is supposed to stop?
pirates
hey guess who the only people not terribly inconvenienced by DRM are
Seems like this won’t (or shouldn’t) go anywhere. The two logos are very distinct in style and color scheme, and the full name of Remedy at the bottom of their logo really clinches it. Nobody is buying a Remedy game by accident thinking it’s a Rockstar title, or vice versa.
I think the reason that people were more willing to accept streaming for videos and music is because of variety.
“Got comfortable” and “Begrudgingly accepted the lack of alternatives” are two very different things.
He wasn’t even making a joke. He was making an analogy that the writer (and probably the interviewer) is too young to remember
Go back to aintitcool.com.
You don’t trust James Gunn, despite the fact that one of his writers is literally the writer of the book you are praising.
I don’t understand why you’re so pressed. The Kara in King’s Woman of Tomorrow run is supremely fucked up, and that fucked up background contributes greatly to her capacity for empathy. These notions are not incompatible.
I don’t think they were defending the title or saying the title shouldn’t be changed. It reads, to me, like they were saying it could very well be the case that the development team had no idea of what the possible connotations of the original name were.
I call bullshit on NOBODY at the company knowing. Someone at that turd factory knew *exactly* what they were doing.
can’t wait until Jan 1 when he comes back as EA’s EVP of “ethical standards” or something.
That’s not how any of this works.
...what?
Kinda missing the point here. You mention the Kinect, but the other big thing that really hurt its optics at its reveal, was its no pre-owned titles being able to be used with it. Microsoft’s focus on being an entertainment box, specifically trying to mesh TV/Movies/Whatever with games was the most minorest of…