Try creating different characters with backgrounds and characteristics that clash or are oppositive of your previous character.

“LICK THE BOOT! LICK THE BOOT!”

You must be young. I’m old enough to remember when “double coupons” were a thing, and yeah, they counted towards sales. 

You aren’t paying extra to save money at fast food restaurants, you aren’t subscribed to a service you pay a fee for where the rewards of the service are discounts on products you can’t use.

If you are paying for discounts you can’t use you are being scammed.

Most other stores I shop at with similar rewards programs (Amazon, Best Buy, Costco) allow you to redeem points for store credit that you can use on almost anything. It’s not unreasonable to assume Gamestop’s program is similar. It’s unfair to compare Gamestop to fast food, where the norm is trading rewards points for…

“But I don’t have a platform to write a long winded article whining”

This person clearly drank the kool-aid

Muscular woman killed my vidya gaem daddy Joe and made my daughter/wife-fu unsexy! Revenge bad lOL

Given their history I’m gonna guess their ‘nuance’ will amount to an exchange between an American and Iraqi that goes something like “We’re both fighting for what we believe in, really makes you think” and then they don’t mention it again.

Yeah I think calling this a “remaster” is the problem here. Just call it an enhanced port or something.

A series with 2 entries and 3 remasters

This is a really surprising take considering they actually turned the cheese down if anything. Some of the most important lines are kept, like Bingo, but for the most part the camp is diluted thanks in part to Saddler and Salazar not calling in with Leon to chat. I also don’t get the hair/face complaints either lol.

It might be a bit myopic to ignore the controversy (which, frankly, I had forgotten about), but I’m not aware of any awards show that bases its criteria on copies sold, Metacritic ratings, user reviews, or number of people who saw the thing. That’s just famously not a thing, so it’s a bit weird to insist that other…

Hogwarts was a mediocre game that had inflated reviews because many people just wanted an HP game where they could make their own character and be a Hogwarts student. Yeah, I guess it delivered on that for those people, but from an actual game design perspective, it was ridiculously mediocre and shallow and is by no…

Or, it’s because nobody cares about the game outside of the controversy surrounding the IP’s creator.

I’ve heard about this issue a couple of times today, but no article has bothered to fully articulate the problem other than “dodgy deals were made”.

Regardless of the controversy, Hogwarts was a pretty mediocre game and it sold because of the IP it was attached to. To imply that it was “snubbed” for awards is to forget that awards are for the actual game delivered, not for the marketing campaign or sales quantity.

It wasn’t misunderstood and there wasn’t any hidden…

This article goes on and on and never really details what the sponsorship issue actually is. Oh, they filmed here, then there was a strike, which is over, none of which is relevant to the story.

It was snubbed about as much as Robocop: Rogue City was snubbed.

I have no idea what you are talking about the game uses mostly the same map and graphics but it plays completely differently. The building elements of the game may not have been your cup of tea but are some robust and complicated that the game is sort of a masterclass in design.