I wouldn’t say that just playing the game with women makes it not fun. I mean, I’m a woman and I own the game. Some of the jokes people make are going to cross the line but that’s kind of what makes it interesting.

Well that sucks. I wonder how many other things I enjoy will be ruined this week by dudes who couldn’t keep it in their pants.

Maybe, but some problems are better than others. I’d say yours is one of the better problems.*

Just came here to say that Garrett Hedlund is still beautiful, even with that godawful moustache.

5. Los Angeles - The have the best produce because of all of the farms outside the city and you can’t walk 5 seconds without passing by something delicious to eat;
4. Charleston - Great seafood and lots of young chefs doing cool, new things;
3. NYC - So much amazing food you could never try it all, also she lives there;
4…

I don’t get why everyone is ragging on Affleck for this. Clearly, it hasn’t turned out to be what he signed up for.

I wonder if there are any Trump/idiot wall supporters who are fans of the game and obsessive completionists like me.

For a company that owes its success largely on creating a situation which allows people to make sexist/racist/other-ist jokes in polite company, these guys are surprisingly progressive.

I didn’t get any of your perceived condescension, so that might just be you projecting. In any event, the reviewer is very clearly saying that the book sucks because its poorly written. At no point does McLevy blame Weir for his intent.

Thanks for taking a stand, its the right thing to do. #solidarity

OK - so first of all, an ad hominem attack isn’t just a synonym for name-calling. Its a logical fallacy whereby one party in an argument fails to engage with the other party’s arguments and instead attacks their intelligence, experience or character to distract from the fact that they have no counter-argument. That…

Their stand doesn’t have to hurt Disney. Its not about hurting Disney. Its about standing in solidarity with the L.A. Times and refusing to use the unfair advantage over the L.A. Times given to them by Disney. It’s sending a message that this type of behaviour will not intimidate the free press.

So many issues with your response, where to begin?

Remember that scene in the Social Network when the Winklevoss twins discuss how important it is not only to have a great idea, but to be the one who gets there first? As The A.V. Club and others have tried to explain, but you and the other trolls are clearly not getting it, this is also critical in film review. If you…

You might not watch it but there is definitely a dedicated group of fans who would go watch it multiple times just to watch him say that...and then write all kinds of fanfiction focused on that/those scene(s).

This is my favourite kinja-slam of the week. Well done.

“A year of industry coups”? Girl, please. It hasn’t even been two weeks since the Emmys.

Good to know. I’ve heard both arguments, but have always found the detrimental reliance argument more persuasive.

The actual reason? Because the statutes and courts say so and changing the law is really, really hard because 1) congress is really slow to amend laws, especially where there is no lobbying effort behind doing so and 2) copyright protections are part of several international trade agreements.

Lawyer here**. If you want to be able to enforce your copyright, you need to do it against everyone. As in, it can be a defence to copyright infringement claims that you have failed to enforce your copyright in the past.