rgallitan
GreatGreyBeast
rgallitan

Buckle up. We've got at least two more years of that pic.

The best is in that Will Smith movie, where they rotate the objects from the security footage to look at the OTHER SIDE of his bag. And that doesn't have the excuse of being set in the future.

That Spielberg story makes me sad. I mean, Hook is a broken movie, but not so that I'd wish shame upon its makers. The cast, direction, and extravagant production design are all absolutely perfect (Hoffman is still my definitive Hook), but the whole shebang is let down by an immature script that has no deeper

I used to think I was the only person who loved B&T 2 more than the first one, or at all. So glad there's more of me!

Bastards.

This looks like a movie that could have been made by John Cusack's character in Being John Malkovich.

Glynis Johns. HOTTT! (though, despite only being in my 30s, I first became familiar with her as a young actress, thanks to The Court Jester)

It's a perfectly cromulent title.

Star Wars: The Audience Slumbers

PAUL RUDD DID WHA- …oh.

I can't believe I'm saying this, but… well done Internet. Great job.

I still have 9 months to go.

"Penny for your thoughts."
"Sorry, my thoughts are worth at least a buck a piece."
"What? That's outrageous!"
**haggling ensues**
"Alright, fine, all I have's a quarter. Now what's this big, expensive thought of yours?"
"A fool and his money are soon part—"
**@^$&%#&!!!**

All kidding aside, the general premise of the games lends itself to a Quantum Leapish sort of series - every episode finds the hero(s) in an unfamiliar world where he must unravel some local problem while learning a little about himself in turn. If that hero is Atrus, serialized hints about the threat of his

I read this in the voice of Edmund Blackadder.

Ah boo, I was hoping this was the "official" Universal version building towards a sexy-monster-Avengers teamup orgy. Movie.

Yes. But, as far as Hollywood is concerned, they're basically the same person.

The master used for the laserdiscs was built off previous home video transfers, and was not HD. It was used for the famously non-anamorphic "bonus disc" DVDs in 2006, and that release represents about the best quality we could ever get out of that master.

The original story mentions something about struggles due to damage to the original negatives, which means - if these rumors are true - that they are indeed going back as far as possible to do a new restoration and digitization. This is a wonderful thing, as Disney has an excellent track record of HD mastering, while