People don’t get fast food jobs for any reasonably length of time because they’re qualified for a skilled labor job somewhere else and just not getting it. I’m inclined to say a job is a job here, and while I would not build a rest stop or anything that wasn’t needed just to create such a job, it’s still one benefit…

Headline is technically not a lie but it comes off as a bit misleading to me.

Cultural practices and norms in mainland China combined with personal experience.

Fuck this guy and he’s absolutely, 100% a piece of shit asshole who acted unsafely and belongs n prison.

Not only that but it’s explicitly considered reckless driving in most jurisdictions and is generally taught in drivers’ education.  One of the core tennets of driving safely has always been to be predictable to other vehicles and you are only ever supposed to break into abrupt, pattern changing action like hard…

Like it or not those are the conditions that have been fully normalized on the roads, over literal decades of traffic laws, traffic enforcement (or lack thereof), education and behavior. If FSD can’t act appropriately under what are, like it or not, normal driving conditions, it should not be operable in those…

The fundamental problem with this “must supervise” approach... well, one of the fundamental problems, is that it requires the person doing the supervising to correctly interpret and anticipate how the system is going to act. So your car is putting on its signal to intiate a lane change? Cool. Looks like there’s room…

Tesla also falsely advertises the product in ways that implies it is not, which at best creates conflicting safety messages that Tesla is liable for sending out.

FSD is not supposed to activate or remain activated on closed access roads like that bridge.

In theory yes. Looking at this incident specifically... that’s REALLY odd behavior even as a driver fuckup. It’s not like someone is just inattentive. The combination of sudden braking + sudden but seemingly “controlled” lane change is specifically consistent with known FSD faults including unsolicited complaints…

In theory the answer here is the same as any other time a company is sued or investigated by regulators... you subpeona the documentation and hope that the rule of law and the threat of consequences for deliberately destroying evidence makes them comply in full. And you hope that if someone tries to pull an Alex Jones…

It is possible that the driver is lying, but as the article text does point out, the behavior that caused the pileup is very much consistent with the specific mode of failure people have been complaining about re: FSD

“though that stealth is diminished whenever the fighters carry weapons mounted on wings or within internal bomb bays”

I’m not sure that I agree with the median assessment.  Unless you create a complex exit ramp and flyover system to get cars around to it, it just leads to people entering and exiting from the left/passing/fast lane which I've never found not to be hazardous to deal with. And as long as there's enough business to…

ACAB

Not bored enough to stop replying, lol. 

Unilaterally declaring something incorrect because you don’t like it doesn’t magically alter the fabric of reality to make it true, sorry.

I’m sure in your mind with your level of literacy, seeing a little red dot when I happen to stroll by this site and typing a few words is a lot of effort. It isn’t.

Dude just wanted to look smart on the internet because he watched (and probably misunderstood) a youtube video about fusion once. Based on how triggered he is by PhDs he’s probably thinks you’re one of the evil “elites” for being literate enough to read and understand a wikipedia page.

Your parents really did make a mistake when they gave up after getting that flat tire on the way to the abortion clinic. Damn.