The thing with doping: you dont take a pill that makes you 25% faster. And if everybody takes that pill, the’re all exactly 25% faster. You could make an argument that Armstrong doped more than his opponents, because he had better resources.

Disregarding doping (as one should when discussing historical cycling), Armstrong barely holds a candle to Merckx.

You can’t say Armstrong was the GOAT because you can’t compare him across eras without the drugs. Is he the GOAT if you do that, even amongst American riders? No. Fucking. Way. You can’t extrapolate his success without the drugs. “Well, maybe he would have only won 3 or 4.” You can’t make that argument. His drug usage…

Damn man, opinions like that are why you didn’t get elected President.

Not IN the bottom, NEAR the bottom. It would still contain liquid spills.

I think my favorite thing about all the think pieces on Ballers so far is how angry people are getting that the show is actually showing the reality of the NFL, and how, yeah, sometimes it fucking sucks to be young, rich, and wealthy when you have no idea what you’re getting into and what that might potentially mean.

Funny they don’t mention the fact that organic wines do not contain sulphites or flavor packs. The latter can essentially change the wine’s taste and color using synthetic chemicals. The sulphites can trigger allergic symptoms, indigestion and migraines.

Real beer lovers don't talk shit about other people's preferences.

The best reasons to consume low-pesticide or pesticide-free produce is to protect the health and well being of the farm workers and the species (including human) in the surrounding areas of the farms.

"Sonalker and Battelle refuse to divulge how the student managed to pull it off..."

Ok, I got the perfect title for the article: