The thing with doping: you dont take a pill that makes you 25% faster. And if everybody takes that pill, the’re all exactly 25% faster. You could make an argument that Armstrong doped more than his opponents, because he had better resources.
The thing with doping: you dont take a pill that makes you 25% faster. And if everybody takes that pill, the’re all exactly 25% faster. You could make an argument that Armstrong doped more than his opponents, because he had better resources.
Disregarding doping (as one should when discussing historical cycling), Armstrong barely holds a candle to Merckx.
You can’t say Armstrong was the GOAT because you can’t compare him across eras without the drugs. Is he the GOAT if you do that, even amongst American riders? No. Fucking. Way. You can’t extrapolate his success without the drugs. “Well, maybe he would have only won 3 or 4.” You can’t make that argument. His drug usage…
Damn man, opinions like that are why you didn’t get elected President.
Um. You’re wearing them wrong. That’s probably why you had issues with fit.
LOLOLOLOL. You’re comparing a thing that’s hard to observe because it’s very far away and is literally invisible to a several hundred pound animal that’s been sighted in every State in America (including Hawaii), yet somehow leaves no physical evidence or visual recordings behind?
The only way those two things are…
This crash had literally (and I mean that in the old fashioned way, not the new fangled “sometimes means figuratively” way) nothing to do with internet outrage and 100% was caused by overplanting on the heels of overly high prices.
Nope. I’m atheist. I don’t believe in claims of a god.
I disagree. One can be an atheist without stating categorically there is no god. To believe unequivocolly that there is no god is a very narrow view of atheism.
Atheism isn’t “I don’t believe in a god or gods,” it’s “I believe there is no god”
Have you ever used an Aeropress? It is literally the easiest thing in the world to clean. Takes less than 1 second.
I’ll give it a shot —
Not IN the bottom, NEAR the bottom. It would still contain liquid spills.
I think my favorite thing about all the think pieces on Ballers so far is how angry people are getting that the show is actually showing the reality of the NFL, and how, yeah, sometimes it fucking sucks to be young, rich, and wealthy when you have no idea what you’re getting into and what that might potentially mean.
That depends on how you measure it. The no-till approach which is rapidly spreading to conventional farming is based on organic/sustainable principles. It may utilize more land, but it damages it less, and possibly more importantly, it is considerably more resistant to the effects of climate change, in particular by…
Funny they don’t mention the fact that organic wines do not contain sulphites or flavor packs. The latter can essentially change the wine’s taste and color using synthetic chemicals. The sulphites can trigger allergic symptoms, indigestion and migraines.
Real beer lovers don't talk shit about other people's preferences.
The best reasons to consume low-pesticide or pesticide-free produce is to protect the health and well being of the farm workers and the species (including human) in the surrounding areas of the farms.
"Sonalker and Battelle refuse to divulge how the student managed to pull it off..."
Ok, I got the perfect title for the article: