That's absolute bullshit. This section makes no mention of committing crimes, it only mentions playing non-SXSW gigs:

I've already provided the relevant text of the contract in my other reply, and it's also in the article.

I'm not saying they should come out against US immigration law. I'm saying they shouldn't use it as a threat against artists playing outside gigs.

Huh? It doesn't back your interpretation at all. It doesn't dispute the language in the contract, all it says in defense of SXSW is that they have never actually reported any artists to the authorities.

That's bullshit. It absolutely makes a threat against artist performing at "non-sanctioned" events.

How is it not the rule as outlined in the contract? The only in case of "pyrotechnics, starting a brawl, or if they killed somebody" claim is revisionist bullshit.

D'Oh. My mind just associated all film portrayals of Hunter with Depp now.

It's not obscure. Oh, and we also do Seinfeld references.

… and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope. And nice red uniforms.

"What's it like being a libtard cuck?"

I knew Sean O'Neal. Sean O'Neal was a friend of mine. Clayton Purdom, you’re no Sean O'Neal.

My explanation is that they don't apply offline, so why would they apply online?

*immigants

I think Dikachu means actual crimes, rather than the "crime" of just existing.

Those fishers aren't living in freaking spacious cafes.

Are you some kind of Vichy collaborator? Dresses are just like pants, except they go around two legs at a time. You don't really understand what this movement is all about.

It has, but he wears Depends™.

It has, but he wears Depends™.

You'd suddenly have idiots publicly pooping their pants in solidarity with him, saying this is what is needed to fix the country.

Cockring, Cockring and Ballgag?