Well there can only be one winner here. They each have to make the case why we should vote for them, and they will disagree. Bernie’s not saying anything disparaging about Warren here and from what I’ve seen he’s always been respectful towards her.
Well there can only be one winner here. They each have to make the case why we should vote for them, and they will disagree. Bernie’s not saying anything disparaging about Warren here and from what I’ve seen he’s always been respectful towards her.
Everyone jokes that its going to be Tom Cotton, but yeah its going to be Tom Cotton.
People love their taquitos but they’re worse than any gas station breakfast taco. The biscuits are very good though.
I mean now you have to make Roth play the greatest hits for your pivot to video, right?
God damn respect to whoever figured out they could take something that wouldn’t sell for $19.95 at Spencer’s gift and rebrand it at three quarters of one million US dollars and sell 30 of them.
Every time I see “Ryan” in the polls I think “who the hell is Ryan?” Like I picture him as just a faceless white dude with one name. He’s basically a stand in for Hickenlooper/Inslee/Bennett/Swalwell/etc.
Me: “Man, Kellyanne Conway and her husband have the most conflicted marriage in DC!”
Not me! Lived in TX my whole life.
Just donated $20.20 to Hegar!
Oh cool, I’d missed that. I like her! I remember her congress run. Ok, this is good. Beto can disappear into the ether for all I care.
Its not an illegal wall its just undocumented.
Um, before Dems can talk about winning Texas don’t we need someone to actually run for Senate?
Screw Spotify / Gimlet for what they did to Starlee Kine and Mystery Show.
“I have a140 iq.” - This is a thing of beauty.
Ok, now lets do the Fort Worth police department, who raided the Rainbow Lounge 10 years ago:
Stabby part at 2:26
I don’t think that would be all of the funding, just the majority. I think you’d include income taxes on the higher income brackets as part of the mix. Taxes on public health concerns like tanning salons may re-enter the mix as well. It would certainly take a lot of money, but the money is already being spent, so you…
Most of those 44% do pay payroll taxes. The $500-600 theoretical figure I’m talking about is the average amount of money spent per person across the board. That wouldn’t be the taxed amount because people who make more would pay more.
I don’t understand the purpose of such a plan other than as a concession to the health insurance industry. Why would you give everyone essentially a catastrophic insurance plan when you could go comprehensive?
Jimmy Carter’s so called “malaise” speech was actually received very well among a certain subset of voters: