regularordinary
RegularOrdinary
regularordinary

i know, right? and it's not even the idea of the scat play that puts me off so much as the idea that he would just leave his shitty sex mess for the plebes to clean up. even if it's not true, it just seems so ... like how i imagine him to be as a person.

it really is that bad. i grew up in san francisco and have lived and worked here in social services my whole adult life, and if anything, the tenderloin has only gotten worse with the constriction of geographical poverty that comes from creeping gentrification in the surrounding areas. it's where the most troubled

alright guys, blatant gossip-mongering here:

STOP BEING A HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA-DENIER. these blatant attempts at misdirection aren't fooling anybody.

Word.

OHMYGODYEEEEEESSSSSS

Totally. I get SUPER worked up over this kind of shit.

"I believe women who are supported by men are prostitutes, that is that..."

LET'S DO THIS.

One hundred percent agree. Also, I get skeeved out by the history of diamonds as engagement rings. Only in the past half century or so have we superimposed a swoony romanticism to the custom of diamond engagement rings. Among olde timey Romans and Greeks, betrothal rings in rare metals and jewels signified

I don't personally feel horrified with the idea of something feeding off of me, and I don't find the idea of breastfeeding to be particularly insulting or degrading, but I'm going to throw ONE HUNDRED PERCENT support your way. Why? Because we're all allowed to have our own interpretations of what social norms

well, technically, kim IS currently married...

Yeah.

why can't all secular folks completely ignore this radical, ridiculous sect, and leave it to those identifying as christians to deal with them? ultimately, WBC reflects on the organized churches of christ and little else. i think it's high time christians start taking responsibility for the damage that can be done

I am irrationally bent out of shape about Tom Cruise playing Jack Reacher. I have actual feelings about it, which ... it's not healthy.

For serious. The photo image is overexposed beyond all reason, and the image on the can depicts her skin as literally without color of any kind. She's see-through, you just get straight up aluminum can. Talk about compromising the visibility of non-white skin in order to sell products.

not knowing anything about gigantism per se, i'm going to throw my support behind this theory. to me, female virilization that results from an excess of androgen production has a markedly different look than looking simply large. her jaw and forehead are large, but they don't look necessarily masculinized to me,

That was way harsh, Tai.

Serving frustrating, complicated life realness. I think you're dead on.