I enjoyed you article except for this nonsense.
I enjoyed you article except for this nonsense.
Ill be pulling up a seat to wait with you but here’s a taste just to keep the shakes away
Have you been kept in stasis too, girls been out for years...
I should clarify by “harm” I meant that he wasn’t killing random women left and right like on the show, not that he never did anything bad to any woman ever.
It’s interesting that you bring up Bryan Fuller’s Hannibal because the only point of contention I had with the show is the fact that in the novels I don’t think Hannibal himself ever harmed a woman.
implements them to their needs
I think the Nancy Drew games have the most consistent obsession with depicting food to the point where they include them as part of every game in some manner.
So, who was writing intersectional science fiction in 1986?
I could kind of understand how he finagled it in the younger pics where he is giving us Reno Raines couture, but when the universe has given us the likes of David Gandy this dude doesn’t even rate.
He was like they are like my family, even though I do have actual family whom I have no desire to cultivate a relationship with but it’s totally their fault because Christmas cards. Also Brad has to be a secret mastermind to have turned his bland CW looks into such a lucrative career.
That is some of the funniest shit I’ve read in a long time. She called him a golden retriever, but the wineglass of diet coke is the line that took me out.
It was a slog for me too. Remember putting it down at about 30% and finishing it later. The scientific points and the little crumbs aboutbthe main characters past were the only things that interested me.
Read the book some years ago. The plot and introduction of scientific methods, profiling etc is interesting but the author’s writing style\voice is forgetful, the characters are poorly developed if at all, and he treats all the murders like a insect dissection. Overall the book has no heart and I’d only recommend it…
What, it’s completely legit “umph”* is something black people use all the time, in addition to ending our sentences with ellipses instead of periods.
I agree the mischaracterized white women will be ok
Can’t take credit it was first coined by Harriot. But I thought it was apropos for this white man’s antics.
I had time. #notallwhitewomen from a man, surely the fall of the patriarchy is nigh😏
Actually our opinions diverge in that you say “many”, and I think the commenters have shown they are smarter than that so its not that serious and those supposedly mis-characterized white women in the minds of “many misled” are going to be okay.
Missing the word “voters”, but my point that its use is well understood by the commentariate and others who followed the election and thus there is no need for an asterisk so lay down your burden.