Not necessarily, as long as they had the ‘site’ follow you and not just the individual author. I got ungrayed by Mark Shrayber who was ungreying any one who asked on his last day. He was nice, I miss him.

Maybe you need to respond with a link to their saturday night social comments, which I will never forget about, and they will slink back into the greys like they deserve.

One could easily turn this into a top 50's/100's list the 90's and 00's were rife with hits that were just churned out and the artists never charted again.

Your words represent themselves, go read them they are right there. Lol, the only enemy is you against yourself. I hope one of you wins.

My patience ended a long time ago, but I’m hoping at some point he’ll read his own words and be able to think critically about them. But today is just not the day.

-I didn’t say ACTUAL TREATMENT I said RHETORIC:

But it’s not a entire group of people, it is a very specific set of people outlined specifically in the article by the author. You keep trying to encompass people and things that aren’t even apart of the current discussion, to what end? There is no “implication”, you are trying to widen the net of what constitutes…

But the thing is what do you specifically resent about this article? Minorities are well with in their right to outline what constitutes a good ally. There is nothing wrong with criticism, whether you feel it is constructive or not is not always a reflection of the vehicle through which it’s delivered. Res Ipsa…

-One: I’m a black woman with doctoral degree so my very presence in and of itself is a contribution not only to society overall, but more specifically to minorities who are constantly mistreated when it comes to medical care. (Black women make up 2% percent of the physician population.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/book…

I just refuse to demonize those people who are actually well-intentioned

As an aside, Your Negro Guide is a hilarious and well written book, if you haven’t read already you should check it out. The author is from Ohio and my aunt let me borrow it before I moved there and it was so timely.

No they are not “projecting their emotions on to HER”, they are making the conscious choice to empathize with the woman who is actually in crisis. Maybe you should take a step back from your save-a-hoe stance and start thinking little more about why exactly you feel sorry for the reporter. Because I can’t imagine any…

What’s in her head or heart doesn’t matter, because actions speak louder than words. Even a blind man could tell that woman was upset by the way her voice was shaking with emotion and the reporter make the decision to continue doing a shitty job as an interviewer instead of considering this woman’s feelings and…

I watched that on facebook today, and I just felt all her hurt and frustration and I was so furious for her at their banality, like she had no right to be upset. I went right over to those assholes fb page and gave them a one star review. I hope that her story will eventually reach a wider audience so people can…

And so many of them are still mad, they call her name every chance they get.

Absolutely most of the best lines and dialogue in the earlier seasons (especially Tyrion’s) are lifted word for word straight from the book. But even with that being the case, the show writers were good enough in their own right that they could match the dialogue with great material of their own. Martin used to write…

Exactly. I am not going around pointing fingers, but I’m not going to sit here and watch people try to gain a mile with an inch of data while ignoring the bigger picture either.

The garbage writing in this episode also stood out to me. It’s like whit, nuance, and intrigue has been cast aside for lines that barely stay on the this side of the 4th wall. I straight up was waiting for the actors to turn to the camera and wink for every info dump/reveal.

I don’t know where they are getting those numbers though because the polls they site is here:

Your close, privileged educated white people voted for BOTH Trump AND Clinton. However Clinton voters were more likely to be educated than not ( I think it was about 75% with degree, and 25% with no college degree).