Why does that show still exist at all?
Why does that show still exist at all?
Who’s the maaaaaaaaster!?
I’m all for casting the best fit, no matter the race for a role , except for historical accurate roles, casting a non white Hitler would be ridiculous, funny, but ridiculous. But sometimes, it’s just as ridiculous to be politically correct just for the sake of it. Like the dark elves in Thor 2, they had to put a black…
He was ahead of his time. If you want to eat buttered popcorn without the buttery mess on your fingers, eat it with chopsticks.
Sho’nuff!
There are other people who say that since he’s using Asian-flavored martial arts, he should be an Asian actor.
Really? I’ve always heard the opposite, at least anecdotally... hence the term pussy pass.
I am one of the women who saw it multiple times, but am I missing something here or do those numbers show men watching the movie more than women? I don’t get the point he was making.
Let's be honest though: It's Star Wars. This movie could have been a cast of dogs and it would have sold the same.
Nothing, because PATRIARCHY! Mua ha haa.
Nah, the secret of Star Wars’ success is that it was a good Star Wars movie.
give me a break with this shit. the success of star wars is their near ubiquitous cross promotional campaign. great, women are seeing star wars, but let’s not pretend it represents some cultural shift.
Props to J.J. Abrams for boldly casting a female Death Star this time.
Um, everything about your article is bullshit. The demographic breakdowns are pretty standard. If anything, this movie was seen more by whites and males than usual.
Lmao you people are so desperate.
Ah yes, the traditional Japanese name “Huki Muki.”
I can’t decide whether this is too high class or too hipster for me to give two shits about...
So her band mates won’t even back her up on this story and she says the rape was conducted in front of them?
I have to say I’m not convinced that the state would have had a good case here. While everyone seems to be focusing on the fact that Sandra died in police custody, the prosecution would also have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that, at a minimum, specific police conduct leading to the death amounted to criminal…
I can understand the desperation you have to not admit that a loved one did this, but at this point, given the evidence, it really does seem likely it was suicide. Wouldn’t a better tack be to admit that and look more at the negligence angle?