And the real kicker is, we have to get North Dakota & the other over-represtented states (or a bunch of them, anyway) to change it.

You’re right, and now we have to move on & fight for everything that they try.

The FBI’s role, which she cited a week after the election, is absolutely crutial to the eventual vote: without it, she would’ve likely won.

But all those state politicians still need to get elected, and if we steal a few Tea Party tactics we could motitivate them a bit:

And we can start bugging our state politicians like the tea party did in ‘08:

Yes, and we need to take a few plays from the Tea Party too: http://www.lcdcc.org/node/181

I’ll argue that her loss in electoral votes despite almost 3million up in the popular vote HAS upset a great many Americans.

Personally, I’m against the death penalty... but I’m pretty horrified that Reagan seems to have gotten a pass on this.

http://www.lcdcc.org/node/181

Please go read this too, if you haven’t?

Except St Reagan wasn’t brought down for long, was he?

It’s my state too. I’m not leaving, but you can bet I’ll do everything I can to get the numerous non-voting liberal folks I know here in WNC to finally step the hell up.

Yes we are, and a VERY divided state.

I know. I never thought I’d be counting on Graham and McCain, but here we are.

You too! 😊

Thanks for the link! I just skimmed the article, and it reminds me of the issues I took with BillClinton’s welfare policies. Would you like to discuss this further?

You’re right to assume latent sexism will be an obstacle to any female candidate for office, and hell Yeah it’s depressing.

No, really, read it! please :)

Thanks for your reply... Now I need to go read why MWE feels that way!

I’m with you on this; maybe it’s because we THINK the GP voters were so similar to Clinton voters so with them it’s a betrayal but with the libertarians it’s more of a mixed bag.