reckless1966
Reckless1966
reckless1966

The T is a lot better though. Better looking and performing. I'm not agreeing with people who don't like convertible high performance cars. I lived in Phoenix, AZ for 20 years and going back there soon...they are great if you live in a place where you can drive top down a lot.

But that red? Fuck that is a beautiful color. (At least in the photo...haven't seen in real yet.)

The new C class looks awesome. And if someone can afford $40K (base price for the low end unit) they can afford the maintenance too unless they are over extending themselves. (Who would do that? No one does that...) The CLA class is the low-end now. The new C looks and performs fantastically. The new AMG C63 looks

Ferrari 458 can, Lamborghini Huracan't. haha. Sorry, I actually love the look of it, just had to make the joke. Nice right up.

I can't imagine that this is going to be a problem they will let stand. I mean...they sell a lot supercars in the middle east so they would have a helluva lot of pissed off customers if the Huracan can't handle the heat.

This is fantastic. And you know what? This would also probably work frequently with adult men. Not too many guys would be proud to been seen in such a light by their moms.

I can't understand that attitude either . If there are problems, and a group feels they don't have enough power to cause the changes they desire, then absolutely enlist the help of any person or group that wants to assist. Excluding any person or group that has empathy for a cause / problem sends the wrong message and

Yeah the wealth hating is getting out of control. Also, here's a thought: Don't be so obsessed with this shit. Just because you can't afford a Ferrari, doesn't mean you can't be happy. In fact a Ferrari will not make you happy. Guaranteed. It might make you happy for a short while, but then what? If you are happy

My prediction is this: I think it will take a while to get there, maybe more than 2 decades. Not due to technology factors necessarily, but because people need time to adjust to the idea of the car driving itself.

Well, there are people who drive them quite a bit, but in that case it's very unlikely to appreciate in value, I'll grant that. And the vast majority of cars will depreciate even if you don't drive them. Unless maybe you hold on to an undriven car for 75 years or longer...that would probably work in most cases. But I

I bet the LaFerrari's are going to always be worth more than paid for. Especially if not driven. (Or extremely rarely driven.) Not all Ferrari's go up, and it's certainly possible that this one won't, but I think it's pretty likely it will appreciate in value.

You are apparently unfamiliar with exaggeration as a form of humor. Both these cars were supposed to come out by now, but keep getting pushed back. I'm well aware that both are actually going to come out, but frustrated by it taking longer than either company originally stated. So I exaggerated the delays into "never

The car that, along with the new NSX, will never actually come out. Those two cars are pissing me off so damn much.

Your years seem a bit off since the Council of Laodicea was in 365AD. I agree with you, just saying it was nailed down earlier than you are quoting.

The bible is crowd sourced. It was not put into written form for hundreds of years, was written by a bunch of different people, and then there was a vote by a bunch of religious leaders at the Council of Laodicea in 365 AD to determine what works were the word of god and deserved to be in the bible and what was not.

I thought just the bull was horny, but I guess they both were. <rim shot>

Better than a mini Panamera Shudder.

Depends on your definition of "afford". In America, a lot of people have things that they actually cannot afford. Maybe 5% could manage to buy one, but from a sound financial perspective, I bet only 1% should buy one. Damn nice looking car.

The Admiral didn't say it was the first. Or even among the first. Look at the car he used as an example. Ferrari F40. Back then, you had to spend 1%er money to get the kind of performance that main stream cars give you now, with better fuel economy, better comfort, better safety, etc. Honestly, I feel like this is a

It's a trend I agree, but that's primarily due to CAFE regulations that keep going up and up. Smaller displacement engines with turbos or superchargers get higher MPG. Since the ATS-V will likely sell quite a bit more than the CTS-V (mostly due to being less expensive), having a fuel efficient V6 in there will help