1. OMG stealing tips!!! Aaaaahhhhhh!!!

Thank you for this — cancer is so much more complex than many of us may realize.

Why am I somewhat upset that she had reconstructive surgery?? It's as if a part of me wants to take away her "legitimacy points" but it's literally part of her job to look gorgeous so of course any other accident or disease would make reconstructive surgery necessary for her. I guess I accept that our health care…

For her to bring such attention to a non-covered surgery is ultimately a positive because it's possible (not likely, but possible) it will add pressure to insure women for whom this might make sense.

If Haskins has a hand in it, I will watch, definitely. I am SO excited to see that someone like her is getting a "behind the scenes" role and one that really affects the final product!

And it's as if that's all she, and especially GOOP, is: her reacting to a set of rules. In general, how to get and attain an unreal aesthetic in *everything* and here's how you can try it too! And you want to try, of course! You take these rules seriously. Why wouldn't you?

Dr. Jantz noted that a reason why men might be more aggressive while IMSing is that they feel less like men. So they overcompensate, do thinks that society has deemed as "manly" when perhaps

You hit on what's so off about them: Kanye must have too much say over, like, everything about Kim's life. I agree that since they got together she has seemed highly uncomfortable fashion-wise, literally and figuratively. It looked to me like he was totally sulking on the red carpet and if I'm correct, I hate him for…

But I swear, for the first time in her life, she looks like she actually has some self-awareness and hates what she's wearing. That to me was what why, for the first time in my life, I've actually examined photos of Kim K: she was interesting for a moment.

Exactly, she was just Kanye's "+1", and maaaaaaaan, if I made an exception like Wintour did and someone I promoted in my publication let that shit of a dress happen — it's an insult! It really is. It shows that the Kardashians, or at least Kim and I guess Kanye (I know he's an ass, but I can't hate him) are indeed…

Hah! Love how Valentino's absurd tan actually makes Trump, for once, not the most orange guy in the room. At least Valentino has some talent.

Have you seen the desperate no-drug-can-make-this-hole-go-away expressions on the faces of Melania, Wall Street wives, every Russian oligarch's wife, various sports wives, etc.? They're just pleading with us through the Botox, Grey Goose and Xanax to put them out of their misery before their next vaginoplasty. They…

And get a drug or drinking problem, if you don't already, not so much for the fun of it but because your type can totally score big time on the 12 Step circuit. Like, definitely meet and marry wives 1-4, at least.

There's been a misunderstanding, despite how apologetic she looks in those photos, you're mistaken: Kim Kardashian wasn't an innocent, pregnant commuter on the train just wearing the last piece of clothing she could fit into during her 9th month and some snarker snapped a picture of and happened to send to Vogue…

Yes, I totally thought that was why Kanye was there!

Me too! And I know Sid and Iggy never shot up without at least wearing their Valentino cumberbunds.

No fair! The Olsen twins totally can't be considered: they did NOT dress up for this.

SO disappointed in Madonna. Not sure what has happened to her since, what, her divorce /not-sure-when-exactly but I think less than ten years ago she would have owned this bitch of a gala and now it's like she's someone's recently divorced, drunk, pilled up mom going to a costume party as a version of Madonna.

Same here. But at least in photos it reads as an ivory dress and gray-white hair which is why people are all upset. I too feel, "SO close!" Still, Nicole, let them eat cake!

Madonna, of course! (really, really joking here)