reader7890
Reader7890
reader7890

So, since Texas is forcing pregnant women to stay pregnant, essentially becoming another party responsible for the pregnancy, is the state of Texas now responsible for any actions the woman takes during that pregnancy that might jeopardize the fetus just like those fathers?

You’re not missing a thing.

I think it’s pretty funny that the whole world really thinks that Amber cut of Johnny’s finger. First he got hit with a magic glass bottle. It could cut off his finger but didn’t cut or scrape the rest of his hand. Then after that something in the bottle made him write angry messages on the walls to in a very artist

I didn’t know that the prosecution was going to read off all of the times that OJ abused Nicole. It was like 68 times that he abused her. The jury looked bored so they stopped. In the end they didn’t care about the abuse because they though it was just a fight between a husband and wife and didn’t prove that he killed

You aren’t missing naything. The jury clearly didn’t understand the assignment and made a decision based mostly on their emotions. They even forgot to fill out some of the forms!

These rulings strip women of their humanity and burden men with the job of treating women like owned objects - like slaves they are expected to control. The is Christian Sharia Law in the US, and this is what Patriarchy is.

Or you could read all the evidence in the UK trial where he was found rightfully guilty. 

In so many cases, what the child welfare system actually does is exactly the opposite of what reason, empathy, or simple common sense would suggest that it do. 

Man: I do not own this woman.

We have learned over and over again that body language means nothing. Body language relies on bias and prejudice. The crying, staring etc that the juror objected to can equally be read as a woman desperately trying to get the jury to believe her abuse. Depp’s manner can also be read as non-chalance to cover up guilt.

You are not missing anything. They are idiots.

“Ultimately what I think is truthful was that they were both abusive to each other.”

Yah the criticisms of her are such dogwhistles. She didn't smile enough, or she smiled the wrong way. Her crying wasn't good enough. Like wtf...

And because she was upset and he wasn’t, he’s more believeable. This is such bullshit. Maybe she was upset because what she was saying was true and painful to recall, and he wasn’t because he was repeating a lie he cooked up and couldn’t get all that emotional about it.

This reads exactly like someone that responded to me online.

Anyone who buys anything from a convicted scammer running a shady ‘business’ like this one from prison deserves everything they get. Which will be, of course, nothing.

I haven’t seen anything in Ginni Thomas’ communication that provides a hook for that.

If I “legit think” you killed my wife (even though you didn’t), and I murder you, I’m guilty of murder. My thinking that I was justified is irrelevant.

Trust me, it’s best to invest in a good quality one now, before demand is too high and the market is flooded with cheap ones that won’t do the job properly.

I don’t know, but I’m more than a bit wary of anyone who has a guillotine handy.