rdean150
rdean150
rdean150

First you deflect by calling everything fake news, which just makes people more suspicious. Then you read some actual fake news and make a wild accusation against the previous administration via Twitter of all ridiculous things. When there is no evidence and everyone pretty much agrees that you’re just talking out

It did work that way, but people didn’t like it.

Finding simple and efficient ways to quickly build this identification is extremely important in film

You make good points... but the Major was a badass because she was a rare case of a person getting a full prosthetic body as a child, which gave her time to really master it and go into the military/law enforcement as a way to use her cybernetic body and simultaneously pay for it as well as any maintenance and

I think plenty have just decided to hate the movie before seeing it.

Wrong, dead wrong. She is adept at using her bodies, but has almost zero attachment (aka familiarity) to them. The fundamental character trait of the major is centered on her lack of connection.

I love GitS, but let’s be honest here. The movie and the tv serieses feature long stretches where people do nothing but give hackneyed dialog over topics that while perhaps interesting 20 or 30 years ago, are so well-troddened to the point of cliched now.

If that were true, they’d be replacing ScarJo with a hairy fat guy in a bad wig.

just give him some plastic keys and he’ll lose interest

I was waiting to see what repercussions there were. Having to return everything after isn’t too bad at all. It also sounds like the bank obligated to accept whatever they could get from whatever they recovered instead of complete repayment. Not sure what the resale values of an Aston Martin, a Maserati and a Hyundai

As annoying as it is when people point out obvious fallacies on the internet, it definitely is a pretty clear example of sunk time fallacy.

JSA has now established the Arrow *wasn’t* the first hero/vigilante and The Flash’s Star Labs accident didn’t start the metas (though gave it a great push). The Star-lites even fought a meta that Cisco confirmed wans’t in Central City at the time of the accident.

Are you the same person when talking to your parents as you are with your friends? Your lover as you are with a child? I would think not. You portray yourself differently depending on who you are with, where you are, and the context of the social engagement. The same is true for anyone.

My phone ???? A Samsung Galaxy Note 7......why do you ask ????

Even accepting that premise (Which, for the record, I vehemently don’t)...

Do some research on IVs and the appraisal system in PoGo, they solve that issue you’re describing perfectly. I had similar complaints (whats the point of leveling up when you catch things that are like 500 CP better than the one you’ve been working on??), and have said for a while that the game doesn’t match the

I think the main point is it helps you get candies for rare mons. For example, there are no wild water Pokemon where I live, so getting a gyarados or leveling up the one lapras I managed to hatch is next to impossible. But if I make them my buddy, then I can actually get candies.

Why would I want to get attatched to pokemon in pokemon go?
In normal pokemon games it makes sense... you catch it at level 5- name it Pancakes- see it level up and evolve and you carefully research the best movesets- have memories of wiping a gym- you fight the elite four and are basically a cheerleader for you own

Trading will probably be the last thing they’ll want to add. People continuously searching for Pokemon they don’t have = time spent playing the game = micro transactions = profit.
Being gifted said Pokemon via trade destroys their business model. While I’m sure it will be added sooner or later, I can’t imagine they