Explore our other sites
  • jalopnik
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    rct1123
    rct
    rct1123

    You can collapse threads in Disqus, so there's really no cluttering. I honestly do not understand the complaints about the long threads here. People obviously like them because they get upvoted and they're very easily avoided (either just scroll past or collapse). You're seriously complaining that people are making

    If there is, I'd love to see it as well.

    I'm seein' double! 300 million assholes!

    I'm seein' double! 300 million assholes!

    I don't know how much it's considered 'bread', but I remember once my friend and I got a huge garbage bad full of foot long rolls from Subway. As we drove home in the dark in my shitty car, he was eating them. We got halfway home before he realized the bag was full of ants and I had to pull over.

    I used to be in a similar situation. I used to dumpster dive food and ride my bike everywhere. Aldi dumpsters were the best. Some of the more hole-in-the-wall thrift stores also have food, often it's free as well.

    haha, I just realized I spelled 'stupidity' wrong.

    I will buy 25 copies of his next album if he names it 'Truculent Stupidty'.

    Come for the horrific sexual mishaps, stay for the in-depth Disqus tutorial!

    Oh, no doubt. But I feel like Dan should have said 'walk before you run!'.

    I can't wait!

    Ok? This is a new release, and I'm specifying that they're retaining old features/commentary, which, as I posted, is not mentioned in the review and which, as I explicitly elaborated on, is important. I'm not knocking the review at all, it's great.

    I learned two things from this post that I'm embarrassed to admit I did not know before: that this column is syndicated elsewhere and that Disqus has a 'collapse thread' function. Seriously, how did I not know these things!?

    He's not hijacking the comments. He's posting, and people keep liking his posts enough to push them to the top.

    No. I'm speaking specifically about them retaining the commentary from older releases. Please note where I go into depth about that specific commentary and mention the importance of Herzog not having seen or thought about his movies since he made them, ie my entire post.

    That part surprised me, and the way she accepted it as fact and now thinks that she needs a 'submissive' man in order to get oral is kind of weird. Like, she's on one end of the spectrum with her husband and now she's gone to the other by insinuating a 'dom/sub' relationship to satisfy her needs. I'm surprised that in

    You're not alone on that. Even when I was younger and in college, that prospect was never interesting to me (unless alcohol was involved).

    'I wish that people like him were never able to find anyone willing to marry them.'

    You're right! Eva Mattes is perfect in both, too. Strong at times with Kinski in Woyzeck, tender but then brusque with Bruno in Stroszek.

    Not mentioned above is that this collection retains the Herzog/Norman Hill commentary for many of the movies in the set. In the 90s or early 2000s, Herzog and Norman Hill (a film scholar) did the commentary for many of Herzog's movies, and most of the time, Herzog had not seen or really thought much about the movies