rbldiver1
rbldiver1
rbldiver1

He’ll be represented by this:

is muhammad depicted in this or is he just a black censor box

I strongly suspect that Mohommad will not be a character in this game

That’s why I am not defending anyone participating in violence. I certainly am not defending the driver of the car in this article. I’m sorry if that wasn’t clear. I hope the driver of the car is found and brought to justice.

That’s the point, you can get extremism from any side or group, that’s what we all should be fighting together. People will always have different point of views, but as we live in a society for everyone, with freedom for everyone, wehave to respect and tolerate the point of views of others to live in a peaceful and

Your assumption is 2/3 correct. I haven’t been raped, nor have I ever been a parent, but I do love a good number of dogs. I’ll say it again - i’d be sickened if any of those groups were protesting, but I respect their right to peaceably assemble just as I do here. 

I have defended and will continue to defend anyone exercising their rights peaceably. I do not defend or encourage violence, racism, sexism, bigotry, et cetera, however an alternative belief is not grounds for violence. I believe in equality, and that means that Neo Nazis get the right to speak their minds just as

Arrest people for committing crimes. Don’t arrest people who have a belief that, when enacted upon, would be criminal. Probable cause isn’t enough for conviction in many cases.

So what you’re saying is....if someone is racist and are acting peacefully, they deserve to have violent acts happen to them?

You do realize there’s an entire blog here called theroot that’s all about promoting the anti-white agenda, right?

Racists do still have a right to free speech though. And as far as I know, there are no laws against having certain thoughts or opinions. It’s mostly the physical expression of certain thoughts, with that expression directly interacting with another person, that are outlawed.

As far as i’m aware, the armed status of many demonstrators was a preventative and preemptive move due to the violent nature of many protests in recent memory.

While the belief itself may not be peaceful, if the demonstration (march, rally, protest, etc) is peaceful, I still don’t believe violence is justified.

I agree, although not entirely. I tend not to judge groups based on extremes, and I don’t judge groups that seem to be extremist by the actions of those involved with the group.

If all the racists are doing is marching around with signs, no one has a right to assault them either.

“Amendment I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

Much different then ISIS, but whatever. We have no idea who this guy was. It could have been someone who was pissed off at people chanting my streets, blah blah and just fucking rammed everyone. Now, if it was ISIS they would have planned it, had the car stocked with knives and guns, got out and did as much damage as

Now you can learn that extremes are just bad. We live in a society for everyone we should respect and tolerate.

Very unfortunate that we can’t at least have one side free of violence.

Not denying this is an act of terror.