ratmr2
RatMR2
ratmr2

The sad thing is that it looks *worse* than a Civic. It’s not unexpected, but it’s disappointing nonetheless. If Honda had pulled a fast one and relaunched the Civic coupe as an Integra I think most people would have been happier:

It’s pretty blobby isn't it?

It really is an elegant solution.

“Here’s hoping that it’s got the clean and luxurious interior that we know from Integras of old.”

It would be interesting to see how much the DC2 performance numbers improve on modern tyres. Quite a lot, I suspect.

I couldn't agree more!

It allows you to use electrical power though, which means that you can avoid the use of fuels that you have to burn. It’s then a question of whether it’s more or less energy-efficient (in total) than a more conventional rocket fuelled with green hydrogen.

Germans, by the sound of it... Pioneers as ever.

Not quite - it's a liability (money she owes) rather than a loss.

The input torque would be an issue for most - though a TR-6070 will handle it (just) depending on the gearset chosen (625lb.ft output with a max input torque of 635lb.ft).

If we stretch the definition of “car” to breaking point, an OKA would do the job pretty nicely:

Land Cruiser Troop Carrier. Next question.

They’ve designed some great watches:

An underrated benefit.

Plus it should stop door dings.

It seems that I misunderstood your post - it read like you were saying that Garland was incorrect in describing someone who was physically unable to drive a manual car as having a disability. If that wasn’t what you meant, no worries.

Not having the ability to use a clutch safely and without pain is a disability. I’ve had to deal with it on and off for about five years now thanks to disc issues, and I certainly feel much less able when it's bad.

Every sixth car or so (make and model anyway).

This is a reasonably concise definition:

It’s a genuinely awful ideology, and a terrible belief system for a political leader. And it describes this pretty perfectly.