I suspect the answer to your question is that they’re fourth or fifth cars, and they just get used every second weekend as long as it’s warm and dry.

He is an absolute legend.

What kind of complete knob buys a 996 Carrera 4 for £125K? 

That’s not exactly a contradiction. More a reiteration.

It looks styled in a way that the Senna doesn’t. I prefer the uncompromising functionality of the Senna.

Yeah, because he didn’t beat Vettel week-in, week-out this year, did he?

Yep. So damn cool.

The ‘65 is still one of the coolest looking cars ever made.

I was saddened when they ceased local manufacturing (both my parents worked for Holden at one time or another, so there's a family connection). I honestly didn't care after that - it was a dead company walking.

Little-known fact: that was the last photo of the dude on the left - he was soon after eaten by ravenous quokkas. He's actually screaming in terror as a few of them devour the cameraman.

Holden is deader than a dodo. This is not the website of a going concern:

True. 

Rich Energy didn't work out too well...

The strong rumours are that Haas wants to get out of F1, and is planning to sell the team to Mazepin as soon as he can, so he literally wants it to be owned by a Russian oligarch.

The big issue with it as a fuel is volumetric energy density. Even if you can keep it in a liquid state, the volumetric energy density is a quarter that of gasoline (8MJ/L vs 32 MJ/L), so you have to have a colossal tank to store the damned stuff, and it’s hideously difficult to store (it embrittles metal pressure…

The big issue with it as a fuel is volumetric energy density. Even if you can keep it in a liquid state, the volumetric energy density is a quarter that of gasoline (8MJ/L vs 32 MJ/L), so you have to have a colossal tank to store the damned stuff, and it’s hideously difficult to store (it embrittles metal pressure…

The big issue with it as a fuel is volumetric energy density. Even if you can keep it in a liquid state, the volumetric energy density is a quarter that of gasoline (8MJ/L vs 32 MJ/L), so you have to have a colossal tank to store the damned stuff, and it’s hideously difficult to store (it embrittles metal pressure…

The big issue with it as a fuel is volumetric energy density. Even if you can keep it in a liquid state, the volumetric energy density is a quarter that of gasoline (8MJ/L vs 32 MJ/L), so you have to have a colossal tank to store the damned stuff, and it’s hideously difficult to store (it embrittles metal pressure…

The big issue with it as a fuel is volumetric energy density. Even if you can keep it in a liquid state, the volumetric energy density is a quarter that of gasoline (8MJ/L vs 32 MJ/L), so you have to have a colossal tank to store the damned stuff, and it’s hideously difficult to store (it embrittles metal pressure…

The big issue with it as a fuel is volumetric energy density. Even if you can keep it in a liquid state, the volumetric energy density is a quarter that of gasoline (8MJ/L vs 32 MJ/L), so you have to have a colossal tank to store the damned stuff, and it’s hideously difficult to store (it embrittles metal pressure…