random1guy
Random1Guy
random1guy

I’m obviously apprehensive about posting private information here, but if you have general contact info, I could shoot you my resume and offer my services (pro bono).

Ha, thanks! I think I’ve read “Fat City” one too many times.

Yeah, Fury/Wilder could really go a few different ways. Fury’s beard is suspect, having been down against Steve Cunningham and hurt by other lesser fighters. But if Wilder doesn’t catch him cold early with that huge right cross, I can see Tyson picking and pecking and moving and frustrating Deontay. No matter how we

Wilder has fight-ending power no doubt, but if you’re picking him to stop Fury it’s far more likely it happens inside the first three rounds. Wilder gasses fairly easily and the one time he’s gone the distance (the first Stiverne fight), that explosive aspect of his right hand was gone.

Damn, man, I really do love reading your columns. It’s got that spirit of gonzo journalism paired with acute insight into the boxing game, replete with all its shadowy corners and blinding spotlights.

Do you have a link(s) to support that? I agree with you and remember reading something to that effect, but I can’t find any articles on it at the moment. Thanks.

Just watched the trailer--I’m in.

I can’t disagree on any of your points. I was always more of a Jason Vorhees fan than Myers anyway. But I watch any/all in the horror genre, particularly with Halloween (the holiday) fast approaching.

Mid-90s looks good, but I can’t bring myself to watch it because I hate Jonah Hill so much.

This.

No confidence in Flake, Manchin, or Collins. They’re all voting to confirm.

Oh, it’s a lock Manchin votes to confirm. When I try to configure it in my mind, counting up votes and hoping Kavanaugh doesn’t get through, I don’t ever put Manchin in the “nay” category. He’s definitely voting to confirm.

If it happened now, who you got: Spence or Bud? I think Spence is too big for Crawford, personally.

Though there are conflicting reports, I’m reading from some reports (NBC) that the White House has limited the scope of the background check, and has a list of people whom the FBI can/can’t interview. I’m guessing the FBI has its hands tied on some leads they’d probably like to pursue. Not very hopeful this turns up

Yesterday, a good friend of mine said to me almost exactly what you just said. There’s just no way this guy is a good fit for the highest court in the land.

Yep. He’s probably in the clear on the sexual battery (to be clear, I believe he’s guilty, but I doubt they could find any substantial evidence at this point), but once the FBI starts really digging in (not just their standard background checks), they’ll find a bunch of criminal shit. He knows it, hence why he refuses

If this motherfucker refers to “Rockville” as “Washington, DC” again...

If this motherfucker refers to “Rockville” as “Washington, DC” again...

I’m watching it. Don’t watch.

Well, in a situation where grammar is thrown out the window, nothing is “wrong.” If that’s the argument, I guess it is what it is.