rando-mononym
Rando-Mononym
rando-mononym

Before any of you bitch about Hartsfield, it’s a good airport.

It’s sad, DWS, Keith Ellison and other dems wouldn’t even stand or clap for her.

I think she’s a terrible, dishonest, self-serving politician who’d eat her child if it furthered her own career.

In short, she’s Donald Trump sans the real estate holdings.

No matter how you feel about her, 100 years ago American women didn’t even have the right to vote, so this is pretty cool.

They should take them to court like BMW did...unsuccessfully.

When I was doing my Master’s program I was in school with a lot of Chinese exchange students. During group projects, I’d work with many of them (sometimes I’d be the only non-Chinese person in the group) and every single time there part of the project would be completely copied/plagiarized from somewhere/someone else.

The sad part is that the Chinese knockoff is probably more reliable in this case.

Ice shape testing has been conducted in this manner for a very long time. The only change here is the method of manufacturing the ice shape.

The problem with ice is not the weight, it’s how it distorts airflow and decreases lift.

When you're driving, you're responsible for the people in your car.

I wouldn’t be too hard on the 911 driver. He was on dry track when he started the pass, as he was getting alongside the r8 he was in the wet and realized it. I doubt he knew the dry line necked down at the turn until he was on the degraded grip surface.

welcome to Gawker

Encouraging road rage is safer than a lane change?

Imagine of they put the 1.5 Turbo w/ a 6spd manual in the fit and call it the Fit Si

Now playing

I imagine her “something else” would go a little like this.

She’ll have an opinion as soon as her voter base has been polled as to how she should feel about the issue.

Whatever man. Having a bunch or really insanely nice and cool cars doesn’t mean you have a small dick. I’m sick of this shit. I drive a really awful car and my dick is small and bad.

What depreciates more quickly, a car when you drive it off the lot or a 30-year-old slugger coming off a career year with a huge contract?

For handgun ammo this makes a lot of sense, especially for law enforcement. The problem I see is that at medium ranges even a non-aerodynamic bullet is pretty deadly. You now have a tumbling, possibly fragmenting projectile still travelling at hundreds of feet per second. At best its a lesser wound, at worst it

What does this do to ballistics at a crime scene?