This is good Kinja.

May I borrow some of your saintly patience? Because your stuff is top quality. Mine, not so much.

Oh, that’s a deep cut!

Sometimes, I picture them being terrible, less charismatic, less eloquent versions of Christian Slater’s Pump Up The Volume character. And I doubt any of them have his (once) fabulous hair.

“If you think her “debt to society” was 12 years for her crimes then you are objectively a bad person.”

There are no superheroes in the world but there are plenty of villains.

She’s 100% emotionally cheating with Obama.

For an account named poo javelin, that is a very specific and informed comment about historically-accurate international military and economic policy tied to cronyism, trade malfeasance, and global affairs.

I dare any periodical to give every relevant article the same headline:

“I order a meal, it comes out with incorrect ingredients, improperly prepared, but it’s the chef’s ‘take’ on the meal, despite the fact it does not relate to what he represented it on the menu. It’s a crap meal.

RE: Buffy: 

“The Constant” (Lost)
“If-Then-Else” (Person of Interest)
“The Body” (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

“Solving or explaining everything was never the point.”

“You can’t tell people what they can like, but liking something does not absolve shows of their failures.”

1. S1-S5.

“Wow, high praise for a show that doesn’t deserve it.”

People who watch shows solely for “What happens next?” and “Why did that happen?” can’t deal with shows like Lost (or movies like Mad Max Fury Road, for that matter). Those of us who also watch for “How do the characters deal with this stuff?” or “What questions does this make me ask about my life and outlook?” are…

Turtle power!

Expertly-written article! Compelling, comprehensive, and contextual look at a very sad event from 20 years ago. This is good journalism.

...by tracking down a kid with goats and shooting him, and then leaving him to bleed out in the bottom of a well?