Erratum: “boarders” should be corrected to “borders” in DJT’s response to follow-up question about the IOC.

“The other definitions that you have provided have been modified to sound as though it fits the current administration, but does not actually define what Fascism is. Specifically the second definition you provided which was modified and provided by Google. Get good sources. Not just anti-Trump biased sources.”

“This is the first time I’ve seen Kristen wiig referred to as funny.”

Duly noted, 3AM.

HA! Bwahahaha. Haha. Ha. Ahhh...

As a former late-night waiter at a greasy spoon: but think of all the fun of watching embarrassing hookup attempts! Especially by skeezy dudes who fancy themselves masterful charmers.

I inferred differently from your tone. However, I have no choice but to accept that as my error.

I don’t hate you because of your ethnicity. I don’t hate you because of your family’s religion. I don’t hate you because of your politics.

So, anything happening with Reuters lately? Because I just haven’t seen anyone talking about that. I feel like maybe I haven’t read enough of the threads attached to this article. If I read FIVE of them, would there be any mention of Reuters?

Why don’t we let the designers go through the entire design phase before we sit at our computers and shut it down after reading one article about it?

Cool story, bro.

Well, my mistake. Thought this would be a sane conversation.

Battleship wasn’t really Berg’s fault. His trademark style was largely straining uphill against the weight of a rocky production backed by a novice studio. Frankly, I think he gave up halfway through and decided he’d make it a payday for former and current servicemembers (by casting them where he could).

“Tell that to the commuter who just flew into JFK to spend time with a dying family member. “You’re being forced to be a pawn in this, but your needs don’t matter because you’re just getting inconvenienced”.”

“And the myriad of protests, op-eds, Twitter mentions, etc. didn’t have that same impact?”

“Please explain how the taxi drivers choosing to take a one-hour break/protest/whatever helped even one refugee. Just one.”

“...but if I need a ride home, and they are the only ones offering to take me, they will begrudgingly get my business.”

“People being stranded at JFK isn’t going to get the point across any louder.”

If persons A and B have the same opinion, it is necessarily attributable to one parroting the other. Without further evidence, that is mere supposition or intellectual dishonesty.

“Lebanon?! Fucking Lebanon, which has more or less been in a state of war with Israel for the last 30 years isn’t on the ban list.”