I don’t care about my fake indignation and whiny opinions, either. Which is probably why I offered neither. But, hey, keep on keepin’ on, trucker.

...aw, you don’t know the most daring US fighter pilot ever to fly a plane?

“...but you totally could should!”

“...it’s debatable if any of the so-called writers on Gawker sites can actually write [...] Rogoway’s one of the handful of writers who might actually be employable elsewhere.”

Preach it, P.

“Yeah, yeah, the standard SW:G kvetching. Nobody cares.”

“...they took the glorious SWG and turned it into WoW thus destroying a great game in the process.”

“They have puzzled players with their focus on changing abilities that work fine and have been for years so that they “work as intended” that real issues are completely ignored. Savvy reader know the actual intent of the changes, however, which seek to move as many abilities as possible to AA progression so that…

There are. I personally know two. Their official roles are usually agent, PR rep, personal/executive ass’t, etc. Very few are actually ghost writers by trade. However, in my limited understanding, most of them only serve as copy editors, with occasionally creative input. Some do serve as full fledge press agents and…

Well, that took an unexpected turn. Thanks for compliment but you might agree it sorta comes out of the blue. Whatevs, though. My ego is greedy so I’ll take it anyway.

That sounds like you’re tooting your own horn blowing your own Trumpet.

I present you with another opportunity to express your wit.

Whatever floats your boat, man.

“Right. And somehow with all that familiarity you can sympathize with the defendant.”

I’ve discussed this case at length with another. I have no desire to wander down that road again. I only make this comment to say I do not presume your disagreement with my opinion to be indicative of a lack of familiarity with the topic.

I cosine this statement.

Deriving enjoyment out of interrupting someone’s day with virtual (yet still malicious) unpleasantness is not defensible with: “People shouldn’t get irritated.”

“You keep using “value judgement” and “lack of context”, but those things work both ways. There’s as much of a chance that this dev simply has a low threshold than he actually is throwing a hissy fit.”

“...you are quite clearly implying that, since he has so much influence, he should double-think absolutely everything he does just in case someone takes it wrong.”

Where is your ability to comprehend and draw reasonable conclusions?