Didnt tought that you guys had jumped into the hate train. Or below it. This review was embarrasing to read.

Very good piece. Many commenters are making good points that there may be specific instances or reasons where the "Truths" might be a bit harsh, but that is the entire point of the piece. If you have goals that aren't being met, defending the status quo will never help. YOu have to challenge your assumptions and…

This is one of the chief lessons I am trying to teach my young daughter - the only way you can possibly fail at something is if you stop trying. As you said, setbacks are frustrating, but they only become failures when you stop trying to overcome them.

This was a good article. I think one of the most valuable parts of self improvement is learning how to admit to yourself that you were wrong, and that's ok, and you can change your mind.

If only the article had explicitly spelled out the exact scenario you are complaining about. You know something like:

Sure, everyone dies.

Congrats on not reading the article.

The play call was wrong. The play call is run on 2nd. If stopped, take time out and pass on 3rd, and wildcard on 4th. Best case scenario Pats get ball with :20 on their 20. If everything goes right they get a FG attempt to send to OT. So if you screw up here, you lose, if you run in on 2nd, best case is win,…

I mean really, how hard is it to believe that a 9/11 denier could out think himself?

I live in Maine so....no? I liked Prague better.

Pats came back from down 10 in the 4th quarter against the best defense in the league. No offense, but you're goddamn fucking right it was a Pats win as opposed to a Seattle loss.

Well you see, fuel can't burn through steel girders....

I think a lawyer who mostly partied and got Cs in law school would be enough to win this case against the dealership.

It's ludicrous. Imagine the logistics of planting airplane debris, undetected, concurrent with bombing a wing of the Pentagon. Then fixing the investigation that probably thousands of people (including citizens) contributed to. The fact that people actually believe this makes my head spin.

Yes. It means that they're unable to process data objectively and are willing to listen to all sorts of ridiculousness.

I don't know if you guys are being sarcastic, but I wholeheartedly agree.

Apparently the sworn testimony of over hundreds of commuters, Pentagon staffers and Arlington residents who watched the plane physically hit the Pentagon didn't happen, either. I used to work at the Pentagon with folks who were in the building or who watched the jet fuel ravaging flames engulf coworkers... listening…

This is so true. If I ever found out a friend/co-worker/family member was a truther I'd not be able to think about them the same and I think it would significantly damage my relationship with them.

Finding out someone is a 9/11 truther COMPLETELY undermines their credibility in EVERY OTHER AREA. Period.